The Media's IAEA Logic Fail

Embed this graphic on your site

I have long held the suspicion that US politicians and major media have developed a powerful alternative logic that they don't wish to share with the rest of us. It's a logic that allows one to do such wondrous things as prove a large-scope negative and infer a universally quantified statement from an existentially quantified one. Really, it's quite selfish of them to keep so significant a discovery to themselves.

Unfortunately, as long as the powers that be reserve the calculus for their own purposes, I cannot, in my commitment to diligence, recognize its controversial claims.

One of the coolest tricks of this secret logic—which, remember, we must restrain ourselves from adopting—is its allowance of inferences from possibility to certainty. This happens anytime an individual or organization asserts an unproven allegation as a fact. We saw such creative reasoning in the run-up to the war in Iraq—politicians and media alike asserting, as if it were fact, that Saddam Hussein's regime was developing weapons of mass destruction. Evidence supporting these claims was, as we later discovered, quite lacking; and it was only on a possibility, scantily supported, that opinion leaders based their assertions. Because these claims were asserted, and the act of asserting is normally reserved for those statements that we have good reason to believe to be true, many Americans readily believed them. And because they believed these claims, they supported—or, at the very least, did not oppose—US action against Iraq. The result of these fallacious assertions was irrevocable: trillions of dollars wasted, hundreds of thousands killed or maimed. Thus is the power of asserting.

For the last few years, we have seen the same sort of inventive logic in regard to Iran: people asserting, without the proper evidence, that Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons. Oftentimes the assertion is subtle: instead of referring to Iran's nuclear program, they may refer to “Iran's nuclear weapons program.” For example:

Washington Post, 11/13/2011: “Senior Obama administration officials defended the White House’s policy to contain Iran’s nuclear weapons program Saturday night, arguing that the United States has built an international coalition whose sanctions have left the Iranians more politically isolated than ever.”

But those who make this reference do not know that Iran has a nuclear weapons program, and so they have no business referring to it as if it were a known fact that it exists.

Ever since the latest IAEA report on Iran's nuclear program was released last month, this activity has ramped up considerably. As illustrated in the graphic at the beginning of this piece, a significantly qualified conclusion has been illicitly turned into a confirmation of previous allegations by a plethora of news outlets—not to mention the politicians and other pundits whom they quote. Contrary to their claims, the new IAEA report does not say that there is sufficient evidence to indicate that Iran currently has a nuclear weapons program—only that “There are … indications that some activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device continued after 2003, and that some may still be ongoing.” (Emphasis is mine.) My head is sent spinning by this hedge. Indication is not proof, some is not all (nor most nor many), relevant is not singular, and may is not is. And people are taking this report as confirmation that Iran is definitely pursing nuclear weapons?

Barring the event in which the powers that be come forward to reveal their new logic and explain why they believe that an inference from unproven premises to a certain conclusion is licensed, I am calling a logic fail. And you should, too. To that end, I invite you to write to the Washington Post, whose website features a photo gallery headlined, “Iran's quest for a nuclear weapon,” and call them out for their egregious violation of their duty to assert only that which is sufficiently supported by evidence.

The failure of someone can affect a lot of people. That is why it can be a big issue.

What time China, a country known to tradition, divorce increased, sometimes because the only child together are very self to each other, and sometimes because of each other's family, sometimes trivial, but because of the wide range of most fear is due to one-night stand. Marriage is two people vow loyalty, smuggling occurs when one party, the other party either out of revenge or out of despair, break up seems to be the only positive solution. This one-night stand is not desirable. When reading the Yuan Dynasty also appeared --- One Night Stand "The West Chamber", the tryst the night, so that Miss Yingying became rebellious, so that the continuation of life from the shackles of arranged marriage of liberation, let ideology forward a few hundred years!Yingying to life is one of four people Wang Shifu, Yuan Dynasty, he even birth and death are difficult to trace, passed down only three dramas, the most famous is "The West Chamber", known as "the world first place" work, too the Defender can not always be. Once there, Mr. Zhu Wanshu books, said: "The reason why the Neo denounce" The West Chamber "to" guide kinky lust "work, not that" The West Chamber "What really explicit pornographic depiction, but because it is an anti feudal institution of marriage love literature ...... "I think because it fundamentally shaken" three cardinal guides and the five permanent members "," three from the four virtues. "In fact, the earliest Yingying image appears in the Tang Dynasty, it was described by Yuan Zhen discarding an image, called "will really mind," he wrote a story outline with the country Yingying wife and daughter on the way encounter the Fuling Homecoming Zhang was puzhou mutinies, Zhang Cui rescued a mother and daughter. Mrs. Choi hosted a thank, and let her daughter out of worship Xiezhang Sheng, Zhang stunning its glamorous, care maidservants Matchmaker donated to Cui Yingying "Spring word" two to tease their minds, Yingying for "moon thirty-five night" with pay, and the dark about Zhang met. After the help of matchmaker, Zhang beauty hold it go. But in the end Zhang Beijing exam, retention of no return, although to Zhang Yingying sent a long book and keepsake, still not retain live Zhang, was eventually abandoned. Zhang was born in talking about it to a friend Yingying Shihai rebuked as "must demon in person," the "stuff" and self-proclaimed "good mend those." A pair of got cheaper still cold typical rogue face! !The end of "The West Chamber" of the couple is reunited. This allows apologists are very unhappy, because this is already Yingying marriage of people, from childhood affinity constant with Zheng, and finally get happiness by free love, a song to play, parents to enrich people go down the drain. If the "will really mind" can be tolerated is the apologist results show that free love is not a reliable false, it means betrayal of feudal ethics abandoned! Two at the end of two ideas, different.My favorite is Zhang Yingying send Fukao of the song, full of grief of parting, I thought the uncertain future, I wonder if this is not also temporarily or permanently, in the fall, doubly sad. [Is official. Correct good] Pik days, yellow, the West Wind, North Various Artists. Who knows to dye cream Lin drunk? Always tears from the people. [Gun Xiuqiu] want to appear later than hate, resentment disease go back too, willows long jade Cong hard line, Qian hate woodland caught oblique Hui. Horse Zhunzhun line, the car quickly with the children, but to avoid the divisions of Acacia, a breakthrough in child and leave early. Hear the cry and go, loose Jinchuan; Looking to see ten pavilion, reduced by Yuji. Cihen Who knows!So natural in view Emotion, Full of bleak, endless cry, Zhang was also behind the officer and go, get married at the end of making the transition in stark contrast. The beauty of the Yuan in this! Not contrived, not learn it, but it seems to come in handy is the most subtle, most aptly describes a character's psychology with classical means, such as blue and white porcelain general elegant and beautiful. (Read the article Network: "West Wing", boundless love affair. Let the vast history of Chinese literature always flashing text named Wang Shih-fu star, despite his history is so hazy, nothing to pursue. No wonder not forget to add a total of reading this book in order to deepen the feelings of each other in "Dream of Red Mansions" in the description of Baoyu and Lin love Mr. Cao Xueqin.If you are tired of fast-paced life, the mind wants a short break, the Qingming might brew a pot, holding a roll of the Yuan Dynasty, so silent string and wind sounded in the soul, romantic and filled with a fragrant infiltration, as if through the ancient, purify the whole body of fireworks taste, you will find life more of a calm, subtle beauty.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.