House Vote Today to Approve Iran Sanctions Bill Would Restore Bush "Cooties Doctrine"

Today the House of Representatives is scheduled to vote -under "suspension," requiring a supermajority to pass - on a provision which would restore as policy the Cooties Doctrine of the early Bush Administration - U.S. officials can't meet with officials of the adversary du jour, because our officials might get contaminated.

What's remarkable isn't that some people in Washington would want to prohibit U.S. officials from having contact with Iranian officials. After all, some people in Washington want to have a war with Iran as soon as it can be arranged. What's remarkable is the possibility that the majority of Congressional Democrats might vote to approve the "Iran Cooties Provision." Aren't Democrats supposed to be the diplomacy party, not the war party?

The Cooties Provision is Section 601c of H.R. 1905, the so-called "Iran Threat Reduction Act of 2011." Here's what the Cooties Provision says:

 

(c) RESTRICTION ON CONTACT.--No person employed with the United States Government may contact in an official or unofficial capacity any person that-- (1) is an agent, instrumentality, or official of, is affiliated with, or is serving as a representative of the Government of Iran; and (2) presents a threat to the United States or is affiliated with terrorist organizations. (d) WAIVER.--The President may waive the requirements of subsection (c) if the President determines and so reports to the appropriate congressional committees 15 days prior to the exercise of waiver authority that failure to exercise such waiver authority would pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the vital national security interests of the United States.

Would it not be totally preposterous to add this provision to the United States Code?

It's not completely transparent from the provision how it envisions the determination of which Iranian officials "present a threat." I read it as saying the determination would be made by the Secretary of State, because that's how it is defined elsewhere in the bill. It also seems highly doubtful that the provision is constitutional, since it tries to micromanage the executive branch in its conduct of foreign affairs.

But putting the legal issues to the side, isn't the logic of this provision completely counter to the argument that we voted for in November 2008: that it's ok - indeed, it is wise, prudent, and preferable - for the U.S. to be able to talk to its adversaries?

Imagine that your best friend, a U.S. citizen, had the misfortune to be detained in Iran. You get on the phone to the State Department, and you ask, what do you know about the detention of my friend? And the State Department says, sorry, we can't talk to the relevant Iranian officials about your friend, because those officials have been deemed a "threat," so we don't know anything about the detention of your friend.

Wouldn't you think that was outrageously stupid? Isn't working to protect U.S. citizens when they travel overseas the most basic function of the State Department?

Note that the extremely narrow waiver provision might not help you much. The President would have to determine that failure to contact Iranian officials on your friend's behalf would "pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the vital national security interests of the United States." Doesn't that seem like a high bar?

And, even if the President were willing to make such a determination, you would still have to wait 15 days.

Adding this provision to the United States Code would give neoconservative yahoos another stick to beat U.S. diplomats with for simply doing their jobs: omigod, a U.S. official had contact with an Iranian official. Like the neoconservative yahoos need more sticks to beat our diplomats with?

If you agree that adding the Iran Cooties Provision to the United States Code is an extremely stupid idea, why not write your Representative or call 1-877-429-0678 to let them know?

 

car insurence =-OOO cheap auto insurance %-OOO car insurance kdsa

Fashion is about a global ambiance than climatic situations. So it is difficult not to acquire motivated by worldwide style tendencies even though Indian winters may perhaps nonetheless be around the milder aspect in comparison with the West lancelfrances . Following the established guidelines, blacks as well as the greys have already been dominating the scene, but considering the fact that traits travel at the speed of light, the bright items have caught the attention of many designers and style watchers Sacs Lancel 2012 . Soldes Sac Lancel Semi-fitted and knee-length leather jackets within the brightest of colors can be a sensible solution to defeat the coolness, confirms designer Nachiket Barve.

auto insurance quotes xol tramadol propecia nav cialis online 8-D cialis :-[[[ insurance auto 279 Acheter du cialis 67443

Christian louboutin heels combined with its ravishing but also fiery designs, it surely will inevitably enhance one's fashion accessory look and in addition will always make her much more seductive.Louboutin's heels, boots and therefore pumps are utilized via patent leathers, satin, bejeweled straps, suede, feathers and thus other attractive touches that would be suitable designed for different louboutin.It simultaneously has an array related with collection including platform, hidden-platform, peep-toe pumps, boots and as well christian louboutin outlet as a few other kind of the women's footwear that may will definitely simply adore by means of fashionistas. art direction, and perhaps the old man is central to work in France. Mattel Barbie the owner of the company and cooperation between Christian Louboutin boots, in fact, earlier this year began. February New York Fashion Week, the autumn and winter, the United Christian Louboutin Sale States and Thailand is the 50th anniversary of the reality show Barbie on the catwalk to pay if Christian Louboutin designed the doll Barbie in pink, red Christian Louboutin sandals. And the following Christian Louboutin Shoes is the introduction of Christian Louboutin exclusively for Barbie dolls and Barbie doll accessories, including a book of women's footwear designed to combine favorite things in this review and take pictures of Barbie Diaries years in Paris designed by Christian Louboutin.Christian louboutin shoes footwear are resilient good enough so that you accompaning you just for many decades.Designed for women whose sense with design and style doesn't interact with their shopping spending budget, for example people a second accepted solutions: determining a web site, thanks to amazing shoes and boots as well as Christian Louboutin Outlet Store reasonable. From internet based, you will find out an enormous variety of super-cheap christian louboutin wide width shoes so that you complement all your attire without bankrupt. Shoe lovers accompanied by a different eye designed for christian louboutin sale design can discover high class shoes or boots via the internet together with acquire them five times lower cost as opposed to a Christian Louboutin Outlet originals price level.

Hi! ALL order viagra viagra online viagra online natural viagra cheap viagra viagra viagra price viagra sales buy viagra viagra,cialis online,cialis,order cialis,cialis,cialis,buy cialis,cialis,cialis,cialis price,cialis professional rtybtybtybu64

Thank you for your article. It was kind of you to share what’s on your mind. I appreciate you for spending some time to publish this.

www.joeydavila.net

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I truly appreciate your efforts and I am waiting for your next write ups thanks once again.

Trix
www.imarksweb.org

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.