It's a Great Day to Act to Cut the Pentagon Budget

This week, a series of showdowns is expected in the House over the Pentagon budget, when House Members vote on amendments to the Defense Appropriations Bill to cut the overall level of military spending, end or limit the war in Afghanistan, and draw down troops permanently stationed in Europe.

What happens in these votes will have a big influence on the expected negotiations over replacing the impending "sequester" automatic cuts of the Budget Control Act with a package of revenue increases and spending cuts. If you want cuts in military spending to be on the table, now is the time to speak up.

Until now, the bigfoot military contractors and their most stalwart allies in Congress have fought with great success to keep real cuts in military spending away from the table. What has mostly happened until now is that most of the previously projected increases in spending have been cut, so that under the President's plan military spending would rise roughly with inflation. It's an important start, certainly, to stop the previously projected increase, but it's not a real cut from past spending levels. If the automatic cuts were to go through, that would cause a real cut in military spending, although military spending would still be above what it was during the Cold War. But the conventional wisdom is that the automatic cuts won't happen; at the end of the day, they will be replaced by a package of revenue increases and spending cuts.

The question is what is going to be in that package.

Until now, the GOP leadership position has been that cuts in military spending are off the table.

Until now, the Democratic leadership position has been more murky. The Democratic leadership - and the big Democratic constituency groups -have emphasized the need for revenue increases. But no-one thinks the final deal is going to meet deficit reduction targets with revenue increases alone. That means that there are still going to be cuts, and those cuts are going to be cuts in military spending or they are going to be cuts in domestic spending. Every dollar that isn't cut from the military budget is going to be cut from the domestic budget.

So you might think that Democratic leaders and the big Democratic constituency groups - who don't want to cut the domestic budget - would be very vocal right now about the need to cut the military budget.

If so, so far you'd be wrong. Until now, the Democratic leadership has been mostly quiet about the need for military cuts. What they're afraid of is all the money the military contractors have to throw around on lobbying and political ads. And of course, the military contractors' money is our money - our tax dollars that have made the military contractors fat, money that they are now using to lobby against putting them on a very modest diet.

People often get cynical when they think about all that money sloshing around. What's the point of writing and calling my Representative in Congress? They're not going to listen to me. They're going to listen to the money. You can't beat City Hall.

But the fact of the matter is that you can beat City Hall. It's been done before. The interests of the few will tend to beat out the interests of the many when the many are unorganized and not mobilized. When the many are mobilized and organized they can turn things around. That happened on SOPA and SIPA. It happened on the Tar Sands pipeline. Eventually it happened on the Iraq war. The narrow interests of the few were defeated by the broad interests of the many.

Why not on the military budget? Let's raise a ruckus and see what happens.

Right now, today, we can start to turn this around. If we can get a majority of Members of the House to vote for any cut in military spending at all, that will be a key benchmark for future negotiations. If we can get the majority of the House Democratic Caucus to vote for a deeper cut, that will be another key benchmark for future negotiations.

An amendment to cut $1.1 billion - a freeze at FY2012 levels - is expected to be offered by Mick Mulvaney [R-SC] and Barney Frank [D-MA]. This very modest amendment stands the best chance of passing. Compared to the Pentagon budget, this would be a very modest cut, a fraction of a percent. But when you compare it to domestic spending cuts being considered - like spending on food stamps - $1.1 billion is real money.

An amendment is expected to cut roughly $7 billion to align the bill to spending caps under the Budget Control Act. This will be a key test. Who is really concerned about the deficit, and who is just looking for an excuse to cut programs that benefit the majority of Americans? There was a Congressional deal to cut spending, and the current level of military spending breaks the deal. If Congress can't be held to the level of military spending that it already agreed in the Budget Control Act, that doesn't bode well for the negotiations ahead on replacing the automatic cuts to come. If Democrats can't be held to backing the caps on military spending in the Budget Control Act, that is even worse. But if Democrats can be held to this, then it is more likely that in the negotiations they can be held to the principle that there should be at least one dollar in military cuts for every dollar in domestic cuts. And if we can get a substantial bloc of Republicans to break ranks with the leadership on holding military spending to the Budget Control Act caps, the vote would be close, and the amendment might even pass; that would set a very good precedent for the negotiations.

An amendment to cut $19 billion - corresponding to program cuts proposed by Project on Defense Alternatives and the Cato Institute - is expected from Barbara Lee. If this amendment wins support from the majority of Democrats and a smattering of Republicans, it will put these cuts on the table for serious consideration.

Your Representative, by voting for amendments that cut the Pentagon budget, will be putting Pentagon cuts on the table for the final negotiations. And that will help protect domestic spending.

Then there is the question of the war in Afghanistan.

Barbara Lee is expected to offer an amendment to cut all funding for the war except for what is needed for a safe and responsible drawdown. Almost the entire House Democratic Caucus and two dozen Republicans are on record saying that they want to end the war. This vote will be a test of how many are now willing to back their demand to end the war by a vote to cut money for it.

Walter Jones and Rosa DeLauro are expected to offer an amendment preventing the use of funds past 2014 in support of any mission that does not have explicit Congressional approval. This will be a test of whether Congress can force the 2014 timeline for when (most?) "combat" troops are expected be withdrawn to become a real deadline for ending the war.

In addition, an amendment is expected to force the Pentagon to draw down troops "permanently stationed" in Europe. How much money this would actually save is a matter of murky dispute; during the wars, a lot of the troops weren't in Europe anyway because they were off fighting the wars. But regardless of how you count the actual savings, the principle is clear cut: seventy years after the end of World War II, we shouldn't be paying for a major permanent deployment of U.S. troops in Europe.

We are in a historically new situation. In the past, the interests of the majority in cutting military spending were not so direct, because the bloated military budget was financed by borrowing. Now a dollar that isn't cut from the military budget is a dollar that will be cut from the domestic budget. If you don't want food stamps to be cut, if you don't want funding for mothers' and infants' nutrition to be cut, if you don't want Social Security benefits to be cut, write and call your Representative and urge a yes vote on amendments to cut the military budget.

Robert Naiman is Policy Director at Just Foreign Policy.

My school district will be broke next year, as will many others for lack of funds. My younger brother doesn't have a job or healthcare or money to complete his education. We won't allow him to become indentured to the bank industry. Unless you cut military spending, there will be corporations left to defend. Invest on people, cut the military.

My school district will be broke next year, as will many others for lack of funds. My younger brother doesn't have a job or healthcare or money to complete his education. We won't allow him to become indentured to the bank industry. Unless you cut military spending, there will be corporations left to defend. Invest on people now.

My school district will be broke next year, as will many others for lack of funds. My younger brother doesn't have a job or healthcare or money to complete his education. We won't allow him to become indentured to the bank industry. Unless you cut military spending, there will be corporations left to defend. Invest on people now.

This is not the United Banks of America. Stop starting war for personal financial gain and start ending them to reinvest in the foundations that help a nation prosper- education, infrastructure, and health care.

intending take delight karen millen dress in all of your travels a person? If so, in that case.
even though your neighbors savor your own holiday? Your solution will be this particular article that one can take pleasure in ones holidays courtesy of scheduling karen millen outlet an absolute drive of electric remote control cars or trucks. These kind of large cars and trucks already have for put together wide array which is karen millen dress certainly invoiced after some time a lot device.

With time caps and YMCMB hats accept seem with a revolution, new era features a accumulating of branded hats like Boston Pink Sox T Stripe, these are the hottest and also the most recent accumulating in fashion, it includes a hip hop attending and it can be real stylish. Boston Crimson Sox T Stripe provides absolute visual appeal like its assorted hues, it truly is customized made, it's accessible in altered sizes, it is woolen, it has bigger continued abiding grip. Boston Purple Sox T Stripe gives you a superior artefact and has regularly annoyed the prospects. New era hats accommodate a arresting accumulating of hats in visual appeal apple and it'll guidance to betrayal your character. It may be advised with abundant accomplishment to amuse our barter to ensure that there investment would not go to waste, from adolescence to produced these hats can get abundant satisfaction. It truly is fabricated up of best brand quality, abundant applicable and in altered colors and an affordable prize. Monster energy Last Kings Snapback Hats are assuredly the final finest of your youngsters. It really is equipped-bodied accepted for its abundant finishing give good results. It incorporates a air-conditioned and a hip hop look. It delivers a damp absorptive sweatband. You will find new era nfl hats with its unique physical appearance and beauteous attending it has fabricated it 1 of the high brands in fashion.Florida Marlins, befitting in apperception the most current appearance as well as the aftertaste of the youngsters, altogether advised for the new technology. With its distinct appearance and abundance it has long been capable to beat actor of hearts. It is accessible in economical amount and is usually a unique area to add to your new style. NY Yankee Alliance Elementary, with its absolute and artistic functions, it has abundantly affected within the physical appearance world. It provides you a persona reflection, it seem in assorted sizes and hues and now you may boutique online from Ballers on-line. New era, a real attractive and avant-garde headgear towards the technology.it really is extra acceptable for those who accumulate a agog absorption in athletics, its additional fashionable and admired and accepted by a lot of. Crimson bull hats accommodate a abundant attending with abundant consolation.NFL Tennessee Titans Snapback Hats These are the very best superior hats accessible all through the world. It really is one of the a lot of creatively advised hats to amuse the desires of prospects. It can be continued abiding for certain. Cincinnati Purple on Area, this really is 59fifty exact collection, these hats are advised towards the over alliance baseball on acreage officials. It has a bankrupt aback along with a symbol of the alliance around the centermost from the cap. It truly is able-bodied adapted using a damp bandage adapted on it. It is fabricated up of hundred% polyester. Somewhat collision with your accumulation but real affordable and we are able to assure you that your investment to the new era hats will not be considered a spend. click here

carinsurance zidjda insurance auto auctions bli cialis :P cialis cack degrees online 8-OO car insurance quotes =-OO

best buy generic viagra cpau viagra propecia online gt 8]] carinsurance 3025 classic car insurance 001 levitra hmctk

best buy generic viagra cpau viagra propecia online gt 8]] carinsurance 3025 classic car insurance 001 levitra hmctk

ordering cialis online 8((( car insureance zqos cheap cialis sale online :[ a auto insurance %]]] cheap auto insurance 6178 Maine cheap car insurance >:PP

accutane 0564 online colleges jpylcg cheap auto insurance =(( car insurance quotes pydtg cheap car insurance Birmingham 5961 purchase cialis on the internet >:-((( cheap viagra 3888

viagra on line 8D cheap auto insurance =-DDD viagra 86476 sildenafil blzt levitra shemale yasmin lee =-OO

buy viagra =-DD online accredited colleges jhliqe propecia wlk auto insurance quotes ipzx auto insurance quotes dlxo state auto insurance hvbl cialis %-))

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.