Keep America at Peace: Keep the Pentagon Sequester

Folks who think that (at the very least) we should be allowed to experience a few years of peace before launching the next military adventure are on the cusp of a major victory in Washington. All we have to do to win this historic victory is maintain the "sequester" cuts to the Pentagon budget that are already planned in existing law. And if we win the next round -- if we avoid any kind of "grand bargain" one more time -- we will likely win forever, because the Pentagon cuts will be an accomplished fact, and when everyone sees that the Earth is still spinning on its axis, we'll all realize that cutting the Pentagon budget is no big deal. The Pentagon will be smaller, the sun will come up in the morning, and life will go on.

Democratic and Republican Members of Congress are talking about a new budget plan. Ostensibly, the purpose of this discussion is to come up with an agreed alternative to cutting the Pentagon budget as required by existing law. But cutting the Pentagon budget is in the interests of the vast majority of Americans who would rather that our tax dollars be used for domestic needs -- including by lowering taxes on working people -- than for foreign wars, foreign military bases, and exotic science fiction weapons systems. Moreover, many Republicans are insisting to cut Social Security benefits with "chained CPI" as a price of a deal; many Democrats are insisting to raise taxes by cutting deductions for charitable contributions and home mortgage interest as a price of a deal. So killing this bargain is in the public interest, three times over. It's win-win-win. The best likely deal for the public interest is no deal, because the "sequester" is better for the public interest than any deal being seriously talked about.

You wouldn't get this impression from mainstream media, because mainstream media pundits are, by and large, cheering for the opposing team. From the point of view of many mainstream media pundits, Washington is "dysfunctional" because Democrats and Republicans can't come together to cut Social Security, raise taxes, and protect the Pentagon budget so we can continue to run around bombing, invading, and occupying other people's countries. Because if there's one thing mainstream media pundits love, it's bombing, invading, and occupying other people's countries. So according to them, it's a "grand bargain" to cut Social Security and raise taxes so that we can keep doing that.

The fact that we don't have anyone in the mainstream media cheering for the team that wants to cut the Pentagon budget instead of cutting Social Security and raising taxes gives many people the impression that something bad is happening -- "Democrats and Republicans can't cooperate" -- when from the point of view of the interests of 99 percent of the population, something good is happening: "Democrats and Republicans won't agree to a deal that harms the public interest in three different ways." Watching this mainstream media coverage from the point of view of the public interest is like being a Cubs fan watching a game with the Cardinals on St. Louis TV. Your team hits a grand slam, and the announcer is sad. But that doesn't mean that you should be sad. You should be dancing in the street. When the U.S. didn't bomb Syria, Washington cried. America celebrated.

Outside of Washington, everyone knows that the Pentagon is throwing our tax dollars around like a drunken sailor. But while that is offensive enough, something greater is at stake. A key argument being made in Washington now is that we have to cut Social Security and raise taxes to avoid cutting the Pentagon budget because cutting the Pentagon budget might constrain our future ability to bomb, invade, and occupy other people's countries. Really. I am not making this up. My emphasis in what follows.

Here's what Lindsey "bomb Iran" Graham -- remember him from Secretary Hagel'sconfirmation hearing? - had to say:

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a GOP defense hawk from South Carolina, said sequestration, if left in place, will break the military. Graham also said any additional Defense Department cuts would be dangerous given the long list of threats America is facing, pointing to Iran's nuclear program, al-Qaida and continuing instability in Syria.

How is the size of the Pentagon budget relevant to Iran and Syria? It's only relevant if you're planning to bomb them.

Here's Kelly Ayotte (she replaced Joe Lieberman to join McCain and Graham as a member of the "intervene everywhere" Three Amigos):

Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., told her budget conference colleagues that senior Army leaders tell her only two brigades are fully ready for combat. Replacing sequestration would help greatly to reverse that, she said.

Here's House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Buck McKeon:

Republicans, led by advocates such as House Armed Services Committee Chairman Rep. Buck McKeon of California, say the defense budget has borne more than its share of the burden since its first sizable reductions in 2011. It's time to shrink entitlements such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, they argue, not to scale down American power.

Virginia Republican Rob Wittman:

Rep. Rob Wittman (R-Va.) wrote a letter of his own imploring the chairman of the House Budget Committee, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) to remember the Defense Department as he negotiates with his Senate Democratic counterpart on the future budget blueprint due in mid-December.

"The time to take action against the sequester cuts to the Department of Defense is now," Wittman wrote. "The readiness of our all-volunteer force and our ability to project power is at stake."

 

What does "our ability to project power" mean, when you're talking about the Pentagon budget? It means our ability to bomb, invade, and occupy other people's countries.

Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno:

"If we go to a continuing resolution plus sequestration -- which is what we're planning -- it's going to significantly reduce our ability to train again this year," warned Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno. "So the worst case scenario is, you ask me to deploy thousands of soldiers somewhere, and we have not properly trained them to go, because we simply don't have the dollars and money because of the way sequestration is laid out that it makes it more difficult."

Notice that none of these people are claiming that a smaller Pentagon will not be able to defend America. They are claiming that it will be harder to send American soldiers somewhere else -- somewhere else where they probably don't belong in the first place.

Now of course, Odierno is poor-mouthing to try to avoid his share of budget cuts. But suppose he's telling the truth. Suppose that his ability to immediately drop thousands of soldiers in some country that hasn't attacked us and hasn't threatened to attack us might be constrained. Suppose that when someone came up with a plan for a new illegal war, the soldiers needed to carry it out weren't already waiting to deploy. Suppose that Congress had to appropriate new money to train the troops to carry out the illegal war plan. Might that constrain the Executive Branch from conducting illegal wars? Might that have the effect of counting to ten? Would that be so terrible? We might have to give up bombing, invading, and occupying other people's countries for a while? Cry me a river.

As shown in this graph from this piece by Ezra Klein, if the "sequester" Pentagon cuts are allowed to stand, then following the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan we'll have a peak-to-trough Pentagon drawdown smaller than after the Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the Cold War. If someone claims that such a drawdown is too big, then they are claiming that even after the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are over, the Pentagon should still have a war-level budget.

That can only mean one thing: these people want more war. What Graham, Ayotte, McKeon and Wittman are saying to the American people is: no break from war for you, and not only that, but we are going to cut your Social Security benefits and raise your taxes to pay for more war.

Is it ok with you if the Pentagon budget might be cut so much that the Pentagon might have trouble running around the world bombing, invading, and occupying other people's countries? Would you prefer that to c
utting Social Security benefits and raising taxes so that we could keep tormenting the world with gratuitous violence? If that's your position,
 tell Congress. 

So killing this bargain is in the public interest, three times over. It's win-win-win. The best likely deal for the public interest is no deal, because the "sequester" is better for the public interest than any deal being seriously talked about.

This was a really outstanding post. In theory I'd like to compose like this too - taking time and real effort to make a solid article...

Congratulation for the great post. Those who come to read your article will find lots of helpful and informative tips.

Thanks for providing such useful information. I really appreciate your professional approach.

This is a really good read for me, Must admit that you are one of the best bloggers I ever saw.Thanks for posting this informative article.

Superb article ,I really appreciated with it, This is fine to read and valuable pro potential,I really bookmark it, pro broaden read. Appreciation pro sharing. I like it

Amazing!I also wish him good luck to defend his gold medal. I like to share it with all my friends and hope they will also encourage him.

certainly a fantastic piece of work ... It has relevant information. Thanks for posting this. Your blog is so interesting and very informative.Thanks sharing. Definitely a great piece of work Thanks for your work.

These people are looking for any excuse to not take action. So if someone pops up and says, "transparency reforms are meaningless," these people have an excuse not to take action. "Oh, this proposed reform is controversial, not everyone agrees, so I don't have to do anything."

Check this link to get to know more about how to buy an essay and make the best of our amazing firm when it comes to excellent custom writing.

http://www.coachstoreonline.com/ coach store online
http://www.coachoutletstoreonline2014.com/ coach outlet store online
http://www.coachfactoryoutlet2014.com/ coach factory outlet
http://www.coachhandbagsnew2013.com/ coach handbags outlet
http://www.michaelkorsoutlet-store.com/ michael kors outlet
http://www.louisvuittonblackfridaybags.com/ louis vuitton black friday
http://www.louisvuittonhandbagsnew2013.com/ louis vuitton handbags new 2013
http://www.chan-luu-inc.com/ chan luu
http://www.chanluuusaonline.com/ chan luu bracelets
http://www.marcjacobsmarc.com/ marc jacobs handbags
http://www.marcby-marcjacobs.com/ marc by marc jacobs
http://www.marcjacobsoutletstore.com/ marc jacobs outlet
http://www.marcjacobsbagsshops.com/ marc jacobs bags
http://www.marcbymarcjacobsinc.com/ marc by marc jacobs
http://www.marcjacobsinc.com/ marc by marc jacobs bags
http://www.marcbymarcjacobs.org/ marc by marc jacobs
http://www.michaelkorshandbagsnew2013.com/ michael kors handbags new 2013
http://www.sportfanatics.org/ cheap jerseys
http://www.giuseppe-zanottifrance.com/ giuseppe zanotti
http://www.sugarsit.com/ coach outlet

"You could be 15 years old and as long as you do something incredibly, I'll look up to you. You don't put an age on anything." That unicorn is actually farting the [url=http://www.michaelkorshandbagsnew2013.com/]michael kors[/url], so you know, only send out correspondence on these when you know your audience appreciates a good imaginary creature flatulence joke.Put your money where your mouth is - err, in this case, it's more [url=http://goo.gl/OY98HY]michael kors handbags[/url] to say to put your mouth where your money is. Then all you'll have to do is teach that [url=http://www.louisvuittonblackfridaybags.com/]louis vuitton[/url] to put his bones away when he's done gnawing on them. The mix of multifaceted colored and clear crystals paired with the gilded leaf makes for a seriously stunning pair of earrings for a special occasion. And yes, the designer that came up with micro-glitter piping chose to call their [url=http://www.marcby-marcjacobs.com/]marc by marc jacobs[/url].For a limited time, get $10 off select denim for men, women, and kids. Eligible [url=http://www.coachinc.nl.ae/]Coach outlet[/url] are clearly marked and the discount will appear in your cart.Just last May, the brand has also teamed up with the famous Peanut franchise for a special project. For this new collaboration with the Looney Tunes franchise, Stussy Kids will soon release their collection of tees featuring well-loved characters, such as [url=http://www.sugarsit.com/]coach outlet[/url], Tweety, Daffy Duck, Lola Bunny, Taz, and many more. Since the beach is a place where you're allowed to be a little cheesy, I feel free to let my hair down and have a little fun picking these totes; That's because runways from [url=http://www.coachstoreonline.com/]Coach Outlet[/url] to Derek Lam, Tibi, and [url=http://www.coachfactoryoutlet2014.com/]coach factory[/url] showcased luxe calf-hair wedges, sophisticated two-tone booties, thigh-highs, and combat boots, for starters. We want to thank all of you for visiting us each week, and for your lovely comments and notes.
Once I started digging, though, it became clear that adding a dozen new pictures to the [url=http://www.marcjacobsmarc.com/]marc jacobs handbags[/url] wouldn't do stars' love for their [url=http://www.marcjacobsoutletstore.com/]marc jacobs outlet[/url] bags any justice.You're either the unlucky bastard who wound up working today or the smug one who is currently strolling around your house naked, in celebration - either way, it's safe to say, no work is being done today. We've got more [url=http://www.coachfactoryoutlet-purses.com/]coach factory outlet[/url] fashion and beauty moments than you can shake a stick at in our archives.The 38-year old Chelsea Lately host has apparently been hitting the slopes over the holidays or was hitting the slopes until suffering an injury.[url=http://goo.gl/C3aqu1]louis vuitton outlet[/url] isn't a name that resonates in the public consciousness - despite a 2012 retrospective at the Metropolitan Museum, archive pieces fetching six figures in recent auctions and the fact her Surrealism-inspired haute couture still causes palpitations among the fashion [url=http://www.coachfactoryhandbagsoutlet.com/]coach handbags outlet[/url]. The 1,200 sq. ft. shop, located on 1822 Chestnut St. in [url=http://www.coachoutletstoreonline2014.com/]coach outlet store online[/url], will show the brand's full collection of luggage, bags, wallets and accessories.Especially if you're like me, and when you have a favorite [url=http://www.sportfanatics.org/]cheap jerseys[/url] to get over-worn. But I do the occasional cleaning and store it well enough, so to preserve it for years to come.Some people dream for years of owning a [url=http://goo.gl/8PkSUC]coach factory outlet[/url] Classic Flap Bag or Chanel Reissue 2.55 Flap Bag (and now, a [url=http://www.coachhandbagsnew2013.com/]coach handbags[/url]), some already own multiples of each, and still others think that they're too traditional and played-out.
Now, there's a whole bunch of [url=http://www.marcbymarcjacobs.org/]marc by marc jacobs[/url] that you can shop for if you want to give or have things that are totally inappropriate. As the evening unfolds, I realize Rocky's not your typical rapper. Yes, he's decked out in a [url=http://www.giuseppe-zanottifrance.com/]giuseppe zanotti[/url], a Supreme hoodie, and multicolored [url=http://www.louisvuittonhandbagsnew2013.com/]louis vuitton handbags[/url]. This isn't the first we've seen of Chiara, who became a bit of an overnight sensation when she donned a flower crown from [url=http://www.michaelkorsoutlet-store.com/]michael kors outlet[/url] to celebrate her dad's primary win back in September. For many it was more than just an [url=https://sites.google.com/site/marcjacobsoutletshop/]marc jacobs outlet[/url]:But there's no entourage in sight;Whether you're looking for a laugh or an awkward situation, check out our slideshow of [url=http://www.marcjacobsinc.com/]marc by marc jacobs bags[/url], jewelry, perfume and more that are completely impolite.While these may look like [url=http://www.marcjacobsbagsshops.com/]marc jacobs bags[/url], they're priced as cosmetics cases, a confusing yet very exciting realization. Got these boots at [url=http://www.marcbymarcjacobsinc.com/]marc by marc jacobs[/url] two months ago and have pretty much worn them every day since.This feeling is not only physically uncomfortable but also may affect our mood and self-esteem.The Japanese urban fashion brand gives a complete look on their upcoming [url=http://goo.gl/JaGdpL]fitflops[/url] with the release of their full collection [url=http://www.coachfactoryoutlet2014.com/]www.coachfactory.com/store[/url]. Aside from the graphics that have been A [url=http://azscitechfest.asu.edu/prada-outlet-australia]prada outlet[/url]'s signature design aesthetic for years, the brand also has given the classic camouflage pattern a playful glow-in-the-dark twist in their new offering.Negotiate - but be reasonable! Diamonds are pricey even at wholesale levels. Don't be tempted by prices that seem too good to be true - they probably are.LOVE shared a sneaky peek of the shoot for [url=http://www.chan-luu-inc.com/]chan luu[/url]'s issue of the magazine on their Twitter and Instagram page, revealing the cover which shows La Cyrus looking super hot with a brand new punky hair 'do.Did you enjoy the holidays?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.