Keep Your Promise: A Left-Right Coalition to Help Veterans and Cut the Debt

 There is wide political agreement that we need to do more to support our veterans and their families. A recent spectacular demonstration was the 326-90 vote in the House and 95-3 vote in the Senate to repeal the military pension cuts to veterans and active service members that were in the Ryan-Murray budget deal. A key question in the current federal budget environment is how we are going to pay for increased veterans' benefits, given broad Republican resistance to raising revenue or increasing the deficit.

An obvious answer is this: Cut unnecessary Pentagon spending and split the savings between helping veterans and reducing government debt. This should appeal to Democrats and Republicans who want to help veterans and to Democrats and Republicans who are willing to cut unnecessary Pentagon spending to reduce government debt. It should also appeal to organizations representing veterans.

Some people are under the impression that cutting unnecessary Pentagon spending is a non-starter with all Republicans, or almost all of them. But in the recent past, there has been a substantial group of Republicans in the House who were willing to vote to cut the Pentagon budget.

For example, in July 2012, Representative Mick Mulvaney [R-SC] joined with then Representative Barney Frank [D-MA] in offering an amendment to cut the FY 2013 Pentagon budget by $1.1 billion, thereby freezing Pentagon spending in nominal terms at its 2012 level. This was still above the budget caps of the Budget Control Act, but at least it was moving Pentagon spending in the right direction - down. The amendment passed 247-167, with 89 Republicans voting yes and 146 Republicans voting no; 158 Democrats voted yes while 21 Democrats voted no.

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has introduced a bill that would improve veterans' health care, expand educational opportunities, help the Veterans Affairs Department address its disability claims backlog, and help veterans find jobs. Its cost would be paid through savings at the VA and taking money from the war budget, otherwise known as the Overseas and Contingency Operations [OCO] account. Many veterans groups have backed the Sanders bill, including the Veterans of Foreign Wars and Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America.

Some Republicans like Lindsey Graham have criticized the Sanders bill, claiming that OCO is not a "real" offset because we're withdrawing from Afghanistan anyway. But this conveniently omits the fact that Congress put $8.5 billion in the war budget this year that the president didn't even ask for. That means that there is $8.5 billion in the OCO budget that's free for the taking without touching the war in Afghanistan, even if we don't withdraw our troops from Afghanistan faster and more completely than the Pentagon brass want (which, of course, we absolutely should do, saving even more money, a billion dollars a month for every 12,000 troops withdrawn.)

The good news is that Lindsey Graham, who doesn't want to do anything to cut the Pentagon budget, doesn't speak for all Republicans. Remember, in July 2012, 89 House Republicans voted yes on cutting the Pentagon budget.

Let's make a deal with these Republicans to cut $8.5 billion from the OCO budget, use half for the provisions of Sanders' veterans benefits bill and half for deficit reduction, and let's try to get veterans groups on board.

That wouldn't pay for the whole Sanders bill. But if we could pass that, it would be a very significant beginning, and it would set an important precedent. The next time the left-right-veterans coalition proposed something, people in Washington would say, "Here comes that left-right-veterans freight train. We'd better get the hell out of their way."

And there are many, many opportunities for savings in the Pentagon budget that could be tapped, if only there were a powerful political constituency -- like veterans -- to help pull the train. Here are two examples.

The Navy recently proposed to save money by retiring an aircraft carrier. This would save $3-$4 billion in just the next fiscal year. But the White House is apparently unsure it's willing to take political flak for cutting an ostentatious symbol of American military power, even if the practical consequences of the cut are minimal. Suppose the White House puts the 11th aircraft carrier in the budget. Let's say to the veterans groups: you give us cover on cutting the 11th aircraft carrier, you can have half the savings for the Sanders veterans bill, and the other half will go to reducing government debt.

The Navy reportedly doesn't want to be forced to buy the expensive and problem-plagued F-35C, the Navy version of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter. There are expected to be two of these planes in next year's budget, at a cost of $299.5 million each. The Navy could buy two Super Hornets instead at a cost of $65 million each. If we amended the budget to buy two Super Hornets instead, that would save $469 million. We could give some of the savings to the Navy, use some of the savings for deficit reduction, and use the rest for the Sanders bill.

Each of these individual efforts might not succeed. But there are many such opportunities in the Pentagon budget. If just one of them succeeded, it would set a great precedent for all the others. The military pension fight showed that veterans' groups can be a freight train. Let's all do our bit to help this train reach its destination. You can urge Congress to support the Sanders bill here.

Everything posted made a bunch of sense. However,
think about this, suppose you typed a catchier title?
I mean, I don't want to tell you how to run your blog, however what if you added
a post title that makes people desire more? I mean Reply
to comment | Just Foreign Policy is a little vanilla. You ought to
look at Yahoo's home page and watch how they create article headlines to get
viewers to open the links. You might add a related video or
a pic or two to get readers interested about what you've
written. Just my opinion, it could make your posts a little livelier.

How to buy [url=]motorcycle fairings[/url] is cheapest?

I believe that every motorcycle sports enthusiasts have a beloved motorycle bike, it is pretty cool shell publicize their personality, to attract the attention of countless people. The following share with how to replace my [url=]Honda fairings[/url] and under what circumstances save the most money, but also get the fastest delivery.

We all know that racing season are generally concentrated in January to Apir, this time presumably every bike owners consider replacing the fairing, No matter yours’ [url=]suzuki fairings[/url] or [url=]Yamaha fairings[/url]. So that we are almost at the same time to order from factory, because motorcycle fairings made in advance, a sudden surge in factory orders, painting job speed accordingly become very slow. Meanwhile motorcycle fairing is large parcel,for example [url=]kawasaki fairing[/url], [url=]Ducati fairing[/url], etc, the volume is very large. Freight company is very annoying such goods, they only like heavy and small items. In the case of such a fixed route, they generally first select transporting heavy small items.

Therefore, we should avoid the peak period, select the off-season replacement. For example [url=]Triumph fairing[/url]. So we do not worry, you can choose a little slower, cheaper shipping methods, very economical, but also can quickly receive the goods!

Thank you for your time!
[url=]motorcycle fairings online shop[/url]
You can by any other parts from us,please click the one you like:[url=]Frame Sliders[/url],[url=]Windscreen Windshield[/url],[url=]Brake Clutch Levers[/url],[url=]Lighting and Mirrors[/url],[url=]Headlight[/url],[url=]LED Turn Signals[/url],[url=]Motorcycle Jacket[/url],[url=]Speedometer[/url],[url=]Rear Set[/url],[url=]Chain Guard[/url],[url=]Rear Hugger Fender[/url],[url=]Fender Eliminator[/url],[url=]Stay Bracket[/url],[url=]Riser Handlebar[/url],[url=]Wheel Rim[/url],[url=]Motorcycle Helmet[/url],[url=]Motorcycle Armour[/url],[url=]Motorcycle Gloves[/url],[url=]Motorcycle Boots&Shoes[/url],[url=]Motorcycle Caps[/url],
Thank you for your time!
[url=]motorcycle fairings online shop[/url]

Dreyfuss openedreplica borse online Rotary watches modest workshop group, a little Swiss town. Above time, the clocks heading to replica louis vuittongenerally be promoted in over 35 international locations round the world. Today, the firm and focuses primarily on borse a buon mercato
low-cost watches and style

Just want to say your article is aas amazing. The clearness in your post is simply excellent and i could assujme you're an expert on this subject.
Well with your permission allow me to grab your RSS feed to keep updated with forthcoming post.

Thanks a million and please keep up the enjoyable work.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.