Amb. Ford: Give Syrian Insurgents Manpads to Shoot Down Iranian Planes

 Last September, Congress said no to plans to bomb Syria, by failing to approve an authorization for the use of military force.

Now there is a new push -- exemplified by this New York Times op-ed by former Ambassador Robert Ford -- for deeper U.S. military intervention in Syria. Advocates for U.S. military intervention are assuring us that there will be no direct U.S. bombing of Syria. Instead, so-called "moderate rebels" in Syria (whoever they are) will do the bombing on behalf of the U.S., with U.S.-supplied weapons.

Ford argues explicitly for supplying Syrian insurgents with surface-to-air missiles, noting approvingly that these missiles could be used against Iran [my emphasis]:

Mr. Assad now depends on Iran and Hezbollah for his survival, and Iran's influence in Syria is likely to remain as long as Mr. Assad does. 
[...]
To achieve this, the Free Syrian Army must have more military hardware, including mortars and rockets to pound airfields to impede regime air supply operations and, subject to reasonable safeguards, surface-to-air missiles. Giving the armed opposition these new capabilities would jolt the Assad military's confidence.

Even Iran would have to consider the safety of its supply flights. That caution would inform Iranian thinking and might even stir Tehran to join us in pushing for serious negotiations.

 
 

Of course, "Even Iran would have to consider the safety of its supply flights" is an indirect way of saying, "I want Syrian insurgents to use U.S.-supplied weapons to shoot down Iranian planes."

It is broadly acknowledged that supplying surface-to-air missiles to Syrian insurgents would be an extremely dangerous step, because these weapons could be used by these insurgents or their comrades-in-arms to shoot down civilian aircraft outside of Syria. Those arguing that the U.S. should supply these weapons to Syrian insurgents have been trying to reassure us that these weapons would be under careful U.S. supervision ["subject to reasonable safeguards," Ambassador Ford says.]

If the weapons were under U.S. supervision, and they were used to shoot down Iranian aircraft, then there would be no question who the ultimate author of the action was: the United States government. In order for Iran to believe that its aircraft could be shot down by these weapons, the U.S. government would have to give Syrian insurgents permission to use them to shoot down Iranian aircraft.

If U.S. weapons are used by U.S.-supplied insurgents to shoot down Iranian aircraft with U.S. approval, the Iranian government would reasonably view that as an act of war against Iran by the United States. How might the Iranian government respond to such an act of war by the United States? Shouldn't we at least consider that before embarking on this course of action?

Perhaps you think it's a great idea for Syrian insurgents to shoot down Iranian aircraft with U.S. weapons and U.S. approval. I think it's a terrible idea. But regardless of whether we think this is a great idea or a terrible one, can we agree that before such a momentous decision, members of Congress should publicly weigh in, for or against?

Vermont Representative Peter Welch recently led a bipartisan group of 19 Representatives in urging President Obama to resist pressure to transfer manpads to Syrian insurgents. Michigan Representative John Conyers recently tried to amend the National Defense Authorization Act to prohibit the transfer of manpads to Syrian insurgents, but the House Republican leadership wouldn't allow Conyers' amendment to come to a vote.

The administration had to go to Congress before bombing Syria because ofCongressional pressure. Now, we need members of Congress to speak up and demand that there be a Congressional vote before supplying manpads to Syrian insurgents.

While a few state that digital devices possess a coldness that seems artificial or perhaps out of place which may be
as a result of depth of effects obtainable. Acoustic guitars are certainly a
suitable ownership and everybody wants to get them. Because each individual string on a
guitar is stretched a great deal, and is constantly being pressed,
and thereby slightly stretched or distorted during playing, over time strings can become slightly longer.

qualitativ. "Gut, gehen wir ��ber zu Cade Calvert und haben das Abendessen . Scarlett sagte Cathleen Hause war fromCharleston . offical michael kors outlet clearance Vielleicht wird sie ein paar Neuigkeiten ��ber Fort cheap Michael Kors bags Sumter , die schnell oder deren girlsas Michael Kors outlet h��bsch, und ich wei? verdammt gut, sie haben michael kors hamiton kein Whisky, Roggen Vaters ber��hren bekam . " Michael Kors crossbody bags " Ashley Wilkes sagte, dass sie eine Menge michael kors bags von Landschaft und Musik. Ashley gute girlto Michael Kors crossbody bag Platz und ein b?ses M?dchen Spa? zu haben Michael Kors handbags outlet online store und alle k?nnen ihre Europa haben. ... Was [linlei1008] machen wir careabout fehlt wholesale michael kors die Tour ? Angenommen, Michael Kors handbags outlet stores wir waren jetzt in Europa , mit der Krieg Hut VIELE Artikel ��ber harbortouch pos und kostenlos Kassensystem in der michael kors crossbody bag vergangenheit . Es Dauert Eine Million Taten Eine Michael Kors Black Friday Modus - Ikone f��r Millionen seins . Wir cheap Michael Kors wallets in der regel von H?hle TV theslightest [linlei1008] macht flattern und kreischen . "" Nun, man cheap Michael Kors bags on sale kann nicht ihre Schuld . Sie haben zu cheap michael kors color purses schie?en Cade im Bein . "" Nun , cheap Michael Kors watches ich wurde lickered oder ich h?tte es nicht michael kors handbags wholesale getan ", sagte Stuart . Menschen waren Michael Kors wallets nicht sicher um uncivilizedSoutherners . " " Nun, Michael Kors green purse man kann es ihr nicht verdenken . Sie Michael Kors handbags ist ein Yankee und ist nicht ��ber sehr michael kors tote gute Umgangsformen , und nach allem, youdid ihn Michael Kors Handbags sale zu

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.