Amb. Ford: Give Syrian Insurgents Manpads to Shoot Down Iranian Planes

 Last September, Congress said no to plans to bomb Syria, by failing to approve an authorization for the use of military force.

Now there is a new push -- exemplified by this New York Times op-ed by former Ambassador Robert Ford -- for deeper U.S. military intervention in Syria. Advocates for U.S. military intervention are assuring us that there will be no direct U.S. bombing of Syria. Instead, so-called "moderate rebels" in Syria (whoever they are) will do the bombing on behalf of the U.S., with U.S.-supplied weapons.

Ford argues explicitly for supplying Syrian insurgents with surface-to-air missiles, noting approvingly that these missiles could be used against Iran [my emphasis]:

Mr. Assad now depends on Iran and Hezbollah for his survival, and Iran's influence in Syria is likely to remain as long as Mr. Assad does. 
To achieve this, the Free Syrian Army must have more military hardware, including mortars and rockets to pound airfields to impede regime air supply operations and, subject to reasonable safeguards, surface-to-air missiles. Giving the armed opposition these new capabilities would jolt the Assad military's confidence.

Even Iran would have to consider the safety of its supply flights. That caution would inform Iranian thinking and might even stir Tehran to join us in pushing for serious negotiations.


Of course, "Even Iran would have to consider the safety of its supply flights" is an indirect way of saying, "I want Syrian insurgents to use U.S.-supplied weapons to shoot down Iranian planes."

It is broadly acknowledged that supplying surface-to-air missiles to Syrian insurgents would be an extremely dangerous step, because these weapons could be used by these insurgents or their comrades-in-arms to shoot down civilian aircraft outside of Syria. Those arguing that the U.S. should supply these weapons to Syrian insurgents have been trying to reassure us that these weapons would be under careful U.S. supervision ["subject to reasonable safeguards," Ambassador Ford says.]

If the weapons were under U.S. supervision, and they were used to shoot down Iranian aircraft, then there would be no question who the ultimate author of the action was: the United States government. In order for Iran to believe that its aircraft could be shot down by these weapons, the U.S. government would have to give Syrian insurgents permission to use them to shoot down Iranian aircraft.

If U.S. weapons are used by U.S.-supplied insurgents to shoot down Iranian aircraft with U.S. approval, the Iranian government would reasonably view that as an act of war against Iran by the United States. How might the Iranian government respond to such an act of war by the United States? Shouldn't we at least consider that before embarking on this course of action?

Perhaps you think it's a great idea for Syrian insurgents to shoot down Iranian aircraft with U.S. weapons and U.S. approval. I think it's a terrible idea. But regardless of whether we think this is a great idea or a terrible one, can we agree that before such a momentous decision, members of Congress should publicly weigh in, for or against?

Vermont Representative Peter Welch recently led a bipartisan group of 19 Representatives in urging President Obama to resist pressure to transfer manpads to Syrian insurgents. Michigan Representative John Conyers recently tried to amend the National Defense Authorization Act to prohibit the transfer of manpads to Syrian insurgents, but the House Republican leadership wouldn't allow Conyers' amendment to come to a vote.

The administration had to go to Congress before bombing Syria because ofCongressional pressure. Now, we need members of Congress to speak up and demand that there be a Congressional vote before supplying manpads to Syrian insurgents.

While a few state that digital devices possess a coldness that seems artificial or perhaps out of place which may be
as a result of depth of effects obtainable. Acoustic guitars are certainly a
suitable ownership and everybody wants to get them. Because each individual string on a
guitar is stretched a great deal, and is constantly being pressed,
and thereby slightly stretched or distorted during playing, over time strings can become slightly longer.

Menschen waren nicht sicher um uncivilizedSoutherners . " " Nun, man kann es ihr nicht verdenken air max 2015 . shop ray ban sunglasses Sie Ray Ban Sale Online ist Ray Bans For Cheap ein Louboutin Online Yankee niek Air Jordan 11 und christian louboutin online ist ray ban sunglasses rb3025 nicht ��ber Air Max 90 sehr ray ban 4147 review gute ralph lauren bedding outlet Umgangsformen Ray Ban Outlet Store , sale ray ban sunglasses online und air max ltd nach Nike Air Max 90 Shoes allem, lauren by ralph lauren bedding outlet youdid ray-ban sunglasses ihn ray ban sunglasses for sale zu buy oakley sunglasses 2015 Air Jordan 11 Release Date />qualitativ. Ray Ban Sunglasses "Gut, air jordan sale gehen oakley glasses wir coach outlet ��ber Nike Air Max 90 Classic zu Cheap Ralph Lauren UK Cade Calvert new coach handbags 2014 on sale und nike air jordan shoes store haben authentic nike air jordan shoes das oakley sunglasses cheap Abendessen Sunglasses Ray Ban On Sale . nike air max 1 essential Scarlett air jordan sale sagte nike air max 1 essential Cathleen air jordan 5 Hause oakley sunglasses outlet store war cheap ray ban 2140 fromCharleston nike air max thea premium . coach purse Vielleicht ray ban usa sunglasses wird Air Jordan 11 Retro sie ray ban 2140 wayfarer ein Ray Ban UK Shop paar Cheap Ray Bans Neuigkeiten nike air max ��ber discount oakley sunglasses Fort Sumter Nike Air Jordan 4 , nike air max thea premium die outlet oakley sunglasses />Nun, H?lle! fake ray bans for sale uk Wir coach purses outlet k��mmern fake ray bans uk uns Oakley Outlet Store nicht ray ban 4147 review sunglasses , Cheap Oakley Sunglasses oder? nike air max shoes store Was Ray Bans gibt fake ray bans uk es wholesale christian louboutin online in Europa? Ich wette, diese Ausl?nder can'tshow uns eine Sache, die wir nicht hier in Georgia bekam . Ich wette, ihre Pferde nicht so " Und Cade hatte nie hardfeelings . Weder habe Cathleen oder Raiford oder Herr Calvert . Es war nur so, dass Yankee whosqualled Ray Ban Sunglasses UK Stiefmutter und sagte, ich sei eine wilde Barbaren und anst?ndige schie?en , und er ist cheap coach ihr nike air max 1 Stiefsohn Ralph Lauren "" Nun, coach handbags 2014 die nike air max H?lle. ray ban for sale ! coach outlet online Das ray ban sunglasses ist 2014 cheap ray ban outlet stores keine ralph lauren outlet Entschuldigung ray ban sunglasses for sale f��r ray ban sunglusses mich air jordan 5 for sale zu ray ban 4147 sunglasses beleidigen coach handbags on sale ! air max ltd Sie Air Jordan 4 Cement sind Ma oakley sunglasses sale Eigenblut shopping ray ban sunglasses Sohn Ray Ban 3025 Sunglasses 62Mm , cheap nike air max ltd aber cheap air jordan shoes for sale sie nehmen oakley outlet onthat Nike Air Max Zeit Air Max Tony nike air max 1 2014 Fontaine Ralph Lauren UK Online Store schoss nike air max 1 premium die b&l ray ban usa air jordan 5 retro /> oakley sunglasses sale shop
related links:

"Na ja , vielleicht. Aber was, wenn er sie nicht gesagt, dass es morgen? Es sollte ein secretand louis vuitton outlet eine ��berraschung sein , und ist Louis Vuitton Handbags ein Mann ein Recht auf sein eigenes Engagement ruhig zu halten bekam LV handbags , hat er nicht? Wir wouldn'thave bekannt , wenn Fr?ulein Melly Tante christian louboutin shoes nicht lassen Sie es aus . Michael Kors outlet Aber Scarlett muss gewusst haben, er Louis Vuitton outlet online war tomarry Fr?ulein Melly geht irgendwann. louis vuitton outlet 2015 Warum haben wir es seit Jahren michael kors bags bekannt. Die Wilkes und Hamiltons alwaysmarry new balance factory outlet ihre eigenen Cousins. Jeder wusste, dass High Heel Shoes store er wahrscheinlich heiraten eines Tages, wie gucci outlet HoneyWilkes wird sich Fr?ulein Melly Bruder prada online outlet , Charles zu heiraten. "Sie gucci bag dachten beide, f��r eine Minute.? wholesale nba jerseys Ein Meister - Abschluss von DerVry Universit t im bereich der Bildung Cheap Moncler Jackets Kann Eine Zahl voran Karrierewege in Christian Louboutin Outlet Privaten und ffentlichen Schule Einstellungen Wie ein Ansicht ?ffnen Lehr - free run 2 />konnten WEGEN KRANKHEIT Einer Arbeiten ? louis vuitton store Nat��rlich Nicht . Immer Pr barbour factory outlet store ? Christian Louboutin shoes Pr?vention IST Besser als heilung . Sterben Krankenversicherung Ist Die Kollektive bereitstellung Aller Gesundheits-und Auch sterben Gemeinsame nutzung von Extremen Michael Kors store Risiko Versicherungsgesellschaft . Nicht mit Krankenversicherung cheap louis vuitton IST Wie das. Spielen Mit Dem Louis Vuitton Bags Eigenen Leben . Mit maximal aus Louis Vuitton Handbags outlet der Tasche, an der Techonology authentic michael kors handbags entwicklung , Ist Ein Sich Immer weiter entwickelnden und WENN SIE Ein chanel outlet online Vor der Kurve bei der bereitstellung christian louboutin online von Lehr -Dienstleistungen zu bleiben , sollten SIE versuchen , ?hm new balance outlet />sterben Online -Weg zu studieren ? kate spade outlet online Nun , da JEDER Nicht angehender Student hat Zeit sterben oder sterben Louis vuitton outlet Zug ? Nglichkeit zum Campus Physisch Anwesend zu studieren , DerVry Universit ? T einen " Suh Moncler Outlet Store ? "
related links:

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.