A Winnable Fight: No More U.S. Troops to Afghanistan

The stars are aligning for a winnable and worthwhile fight on U.S. policy in Afghanistan in the next several weeks: stopping the Obama Administration from sending more troops.

It should be winnable, because: the public is against sending more troops, the overwhelming majority of Democrats are against sending more troops, key Democrats in Congress have begun to speak out against sending more troops, the Obama Administration is divided, President Obama hasn't taken a public position, and the Obama Administration has signaled that it will not take a public position for several weeks. The delay gives opponents time to mobilize, more Members of Congress the opportunity to speak out before the Administration solidifies its position.

It's a worthwhile fight, among other reasons, because if we want the U.S. government to seriously pursue diplomatic efforts to resolve the Afghanistan conflict politically, we have to jam them up on the "military option."

On October 1, the U.S. plans to talk to Iran. This is happening, in part, because Washington doesn't see a "military option" in Iran now. Part of the reason Washington doesn't see a military option in Iran is because they don't perceive the U.S. public as supporting a military option.

Denying the Pentagon access to more U.S. troops isn't the most subtle, nuanced way to influence U.S. policy. But it's the main lever that the public has.

The political battle over more U.S. troops isn't a battle over what's going to happen in Afghanistan next month. The troop increase that President Obama approved earlier this year has not yet been completed. It's a political battle about what's going to happen in the next several years.

Indeed, if President Obama were to approve 10,000 more troops beyond the increase already approved, the likely effect over time would be simply to replace the troops from other countries that are almost certain to leave.

Canada's Prime Minister has recently reaffirmed that Canada's 2,500 troops are leaving in 2011.

Italy's Prime Minister Berlusconi says Italy's 2,800 troops should leave Afghanistan "soon." A key coalition partner says they should leave in three months.

British Prime Minister Brown has told the US he wants to cut UK troop numbers from more than 9,000 to fewer than 5,000 in "three to five years, maximum," the Independent recently reported.

That's about 10,000 troops right there. Of course, these withdrawals are likely to spur others.

In 2011, the "foreign" military forces in Afghanistan will be overwhelmingly U.S. forces, even more so than today. That's the world that would be put in place by the U.S. troop increase that's being proposed.

Now is the time for Congress and the American people to speak up. If the Administration publicly commits itself to sending more troops, it will be much harder for Democrats in Congress to oppose.

In the past 8 years over 820 US troops have been killed. Bush mishandled (everything, including) the Afghanistan war to the extent violence keeps spiking even after years. The military elite have made (IMHO) some serious mistakes: by bombing wedding parties, killing large numbers of civilians, kicking in doors and ransacking homes unnecessarily, imprisoning tens of thousands of civilians, constant bombings in the Pashtun area, etc... As a consequence it fuels anti_Americanism which emboldens the extreme elements within the region.

Furthermore fusing al-Qaeda and the Taliban is another mistake. They have totally different ideologies. Al-Qaeda has an international agenda whereas the latter has a local focus. The Taliban are not interested in the US except in getting the American forces to leave. By prolonging our stay the locals will see the occupation as an attempt to colonize their country which will eventuate in their siding with the Taliban. Obama, earlier this year, had suggested negotiating with the moderate Taliban. Good idea.

Moreover, according to former CIA analysts, al-Qaeda is not in Afghanistan. They emphasize the way to defeat al-Qaeda is with police work and special ops. The focus needs to be on monitoring, interdicting and disrupting al-Qaeda because military attacks are ineffective.

Rather than summoning a team of military experts McCrystal summoned think tank experts instead. Perhaps that was also a mistake.

Matt John

He did not call all of West Point the enemy camp.He was referring to the older mritlaiy, the ones who disagreed with him. You could look up the metaphor enemy camp, and find that it is a COMMONLY-USED phrase in all of politics.And I guess you disagree with this guy, who said: “Victory means exit strategy, and it’s important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is. “I think it’s also important for the president to lay out a timetable as to how long they will be involved and when they will be withdrawn.” Yeah. George W. Bush, speaking of Clinton.

car insurance quotes =))) generic propecia 0162 car insurance quotes 84947 car insurance quotes ewd viagra >:-PP

buy viagra gilj buy cialis online %O buy viagra 33014 Memphis car insurance quotes jxhrq cialis =-[ Vermont cheap car insurance 229515 cialis for sale izgn

cialis >:) auto insurance quotes :-)) auto insurance quotes xtt auto insurance quotes :-D cialis online 8-DDD cheapest auto insurance 5360

cheap car insurance Detroit 366118 buy cialis online kqoefr discount viagra volvmm new jersey car insurance :)) auto insurance quotes Hawaii 254 auto insurance quotes 755 Kentucky auto insurance quotes :PPP

life insurance quotes 692527 online accredited colleges =-[[[ auto insurance quotes fxcet auto insurance quotes Nebraska >:]] sildenafil efif auto insurance quotes 18197 levitra 59672

car insurance quote >:[[[ online colleges ckwsqd cialis kojd best life insurance 594 viagra cheap mdjwzl

buy cialis ryeko cialis 8-[[ auto insurance quotes 6295 viagra online >:DD texas omaha poker mljakm

cialis 124145 cheap auto insurance 8983 insurance td car 10079 car rental insurance %-D cheap auto insurance 57066 cheap car insurancce 8OO car insurance online :-PP

new jersey car insurance =] order viagra online without a prescription 530245 levitra =-DDD cargo insurance liability 911 auto insurance quotes North Carolina zqi

generic for you cialis yrr cheap car insurance in nj wwp generic cialis 5886 impotence dealing with 50400 cialis viagra online :-OOO order viagra without a prescription >:-[ online vehicle nsurance mbby

Hi! ALL viagra viagra viagra online viagra viagra cheap viagra viagra viagra sales viagra viagra,generic cialis,cialis,cialis online,cialis,cialis,buy cialis,cialis,buy cialis,cheap cialis,cialis reviews rtybtybtybu64

the best online viagra gpr cheap insurance quotes gzatg no prescription cialis lowest price :))) sildenafil rwdgvb how does cialis work =) cialis for cheap glvwhl

cheap how little insurance company %-OOO generic cialis sxbhst cheap auto insurance >:OO cheap car insurance >:-] cheap insurance 069 sildenafil best buy =PPP

auto quotes for insurance 46613 cheap insurance bffdgh ordering cialis online %-((( autoinsurance rates 140 where to buy generic cialis hwsq

auto insurance quotes 755571 Illinois auto insurance quotes 868 car insurance in florida >:-OO affordable car insurance quotes npeb frizzells car insurance 4779 car insurance quotes Columbia ljrxgz cialis =-))

degree programs online management =]] buildings insurance cheap contents NJ banx Burlington cheap florida auto insurance 44753 auto insurance online quote New Orleans 881 cheap car insurance quotes online 672

Others keep using the CD every night, as they like
the overlay audio keeping out exterior noises, and with further use, it
seems that other allergic problems are solved for many.
Any reputable online business puts their shopping
cart on a secure server. But for some kids, certain behaviors can be
extreme and disruptive,. If someone was seriously injured or severely ill, then
also he had to go to take the medications or to depend
upon someone to bring the drugs for them.

We're a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community.

Your web site offered us with valuable information to work on. You've done an impressive job
and our whole community will be grateful to you.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.