UN: Time for Direct Talks with Afghan Taliban Leaders

The top United Nations official for Afghanistan has called for direct talks with senior Taliban leaders. Is anyone in Washington listening?

The New York Times reported Sunday that Kai Eide, the United Nations special representative for Afghanistan, "called on Afghan officials to seek the removal of at least some senior Taliban leaders from the United Nations' list of terrorists, as a first step toward opening direct negotiations with the insurgent group."

Eide also called on the U.S. to speed its review of the roughly 750 detainees in its military prisons in Afghanistan - another principal grievance of Taliban leaders.

Eide said he hoped that the two steps would open the way for face-to-face talks between Afghan officials and Taliban leaders.

"If you want relevant results, then you have to talk to the relevant person in authority," Mr. Eide said. "I think the time has come to do it."

It's an unquestioned dogma in official Washington that while of course every informed person knows that the endgame in Afghanistan is a negotiated political settlement with the Afghan Taliban, the time is not ripe for negotiations; the Afghan Taliban have to be weakened first through military escalation, because their leaders are not ready to talk peace.

It's never explained how U.S. officals know that Afghan Taliban leaders are not ready to talk peace, unless the definition of "talking peace" is "acceding to U.S. demands." A reasonable inference is that these statements by U.S. officials are a dodge: U.S. officials are not ready to talk peace.

The empirical method of determining whether someone is ready to talk peace is that you try to talk peace with them; so far, that has not been meaningfully tried. Now the UN's Kai Eide, by calling for these two concrete steps to try to move towards direct talks, has laid down a marker that we can all measure to evaluate if U.S. officials are ready to talk peace. Is the U.S. pushing for the removal of senior Taliban officials from the U.N. blacklist so they can participate in talks? Is it speeding its review of Afghan detainees? If not, then we can fairly infer that U.S. officials are not ready to talk peace, and need more pressure to become ready.

If U.S. officials are ever pressed by U.S. reporters to explain evidence that Afghan Taliban leaders are willing to talk peace, it's not showing up in the news pages.

On January 21, for example, the Wall Street Journal reported that Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, one of the three main leaders of the Afghan insurgency, "has held out the possibility of negotiating with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and outlined a roadmap for political reconciliation, opening what could be the most promising avenue for Mr. Karzai's effort to peacefully resolve the conflict."

Hekmatyar called for elections under a neutral caretaker government once U.S.-led forces withdraw and said he would accept an impartial international peacekeeping force.

"Negotiations with the Afghan government will not be fruitful unless the foreigners give the Afghan government the authority to start negotiations independently - but unfortunately it has not been given this authority yet," Hekmatyar said.

What is the U.S. reaction to this? All the Journal says is that the U.S. government refuses to make a meaningful distinction between Hekmatyar and the two other main insurgent chiefs.

Meanwhile, the evidence is mounting that the current U.S. military escalation is unlikely to make much positive difference to the eventual negotiated solution. The full cables sent by Ambassador Eikenberry represented a "detailed rebuttal to the counterinsurgency strategy" offered by Gen. McChrystal, the New York Times reported Monday, and argued that sending more troops would delay, rather than bring forward, the eventual withdrawal of U.S. troops:

"Sending additional forces will delay the day when Afghans will take over, and make it difficult, if not impossible, to bring our people home on a reasonable timetable," he wrote Nov. 6.

Meanwhile, on Monday the Times pointed out that the cooperation from Pakistan that the U.S. was expecting as an essential part of its Afghan strategy will almost surely not materialize before the date that Obama said he would review the strategy.

When Obama announced his decision to send additional troops, he made clear the chances of success hinged significantly on Pakistan's willingness to eliminate militants' havens in its territory, the Times notes. US officials described the surge of troops as a hammer, but said it "required a Pakistani anvil on the other side of the border to prevent the Taliban from retreating to the mountains." Now, the Times says, that strategy "appears imperiled" by Pakistan's statement that it would not launch any new offensive "for as long as a year," noting that some US officials "think it could be longer."

The Times notes that in his Dec. 1 speech at West Point, Obama said he would reassess his plan at the end of 2010. But if Pakistan does not launch a new offensive this year, operations on Pakistan's side of the border will not have begun by the time Obama has made this promised assessment.

Since there is little reason to believe that military escalation is going to change anything fundamental in a positive way for the outcome of negotiations, there is no reason to wait to start negotiations.

In the next few months, Congress will have a window of opportunity to try to redirect U.S. policy, when the Administration must come to Congress for more money to pay for its military escalation.

In preparation for Congress' consideration of the war supplemental, we need a vigorous public propaganda in favor of negotiations and a timeline for U.S. military withdrawal. Nothing meaningful is likely to come out of Congress if the Congressional deliberation is not preceded by a vigorous public discussion of negotiations and a withdrawal timeline.

If you would like to contribute to the discussion on behalf of negotiations and a timeline for withdrawal, a strategic place to add your voice is here.

Richard:I have had chats with a few people who sreved in Afghanistan, as I am certain, have you.The general consensus seems to be that the allies, Canada, the US and so on, brutally lie to us about the nature of the culture etc. and re-write actual situation reports to be in keeping with the narrative of Taliban Vs. Allies' when in fact it is Muslims and Afghan culture generally speaking at war with all of us in different ways and to different degrees here and there.For example when actual official police use their authority and weapons to steal from villages and rape locals and the locals string them up as the bastards they are, our media reports it as they were killed by the Taliban in order to maintain confidence in the fake notion that all those we train and equip are rational actors in defense of Western secular democracy. At least to an acceptable degree. The above example is not hypothetical but factual and accurate by the way.So chances are these were real police' in the sense that they were equipped, trained and uniformed by our governments and then acted on their own ideology and perhaps individual interests, be it financial or religious or self protection. That would be my guess anyway based on what I have been told by various members of the Canadian forces, some of whom where actually dealing with direct from-the-field intel reports.Frankly I think I should probably include a version of this comment into the post.

life insurance 635453 propecia 057677 car insurance quotes ca wpbp

buy viagra mncxb cialis 481 pfizer sildenafil viagra 614 cheap car insurance 238674 insurance auto klk cialis :-P Tadalafil 337405

viagra >:-DD car insurance online tnayfu auto insurance quotes Anchorage 550 cialis lwswxj cheap car insurance lhytw auto insurance 8) alternatives to viagra 5791

prednisone kyjsva eastwood auto insurance pjymc auto insurance quotes :((( car insurance quotes 42708 cialis online cczrm viagra jmvs

Social communication plays an important role in our daily life. You can know a lot of people in the party and also you will be more familiar with Christian Louboutin Outlet the persons that you have already known. The importance of parties is obvious. If you want to leave deep impressions to others, good self-images seem especially critical at this situation. How to enhance your self-image becomes a matter for you. When we mention how to enhance our self-image, what appears in your head first? Of course Christian Louboutin Christian Louboutin Shoes shoes which are favored by many women all over the world. for sale because the company needed to move stocks from last year to make room for new furniture or shoes too much of a mark,design and style is not for s Women 's christian louboutin sales shoes ? Monitoring Label ? One When items to a store Christian Louboutin Shoes Outlet to look for sales,you must remember that many people have tried the same shoes that you are testing.Thus,to prevent the spread of germs,bacteria and fungi,it is essential that there is any kind of foot protection.Most shoe shops offer a small Footie but you have your own to do justice.Barber 50 designer celebration of the anniversary has inspired countless Discount Christian Louboutin Shoes others to envy a gift to the public, but the heels of the super-fans, perhaps the most popular course is very nice elegant high heels, one billion pairs in christian louboutin outlet online the collection, as if the world can match. The designers, in the eyes of young girls Muse, as they relate to own a nice pair high heels next time a designer shoes for women everywhere are essential, and that Barbie has a French Christian Louboutin shoes elect.Cheap Christian Louboutin extraordinary champion of women's designer shoes, shoes are the key signature red there is no doubt that any fan of super-high-heels love heart. For the

best buy generic viagra vhv automobile insurance high risk 65976 a auto insurance 953 cialis online 947 buy cialis wnju cialis sales :O insurance car classic 2017

buy viagra 824 ordering viagra =-] mg dysfunction erectile sildenafil %-((( new york car insurance ihjfuc levitra buy 8PP auto insurance quotes OH 073

cheap auto insurance 74068 auto insurance quotes 66729 levitra 856948 cheap auto insurance howv order prednisone online 89884

buy accutane hjzxcl public liability insurance company >:PP buy cialis ykm discount auto insurance 59568 online auto insurance flf Pennsylvania cheap car insurance :]]] prednisone no prescription 8DD

cheap insurance quotes 118 buy viagra without prescription kobdmx sildenafil =-O buying viagra online =-(( levitra :P product liability insurance quote mzoc car insurance quotes rcdo

life insurance quotes :-OOO insurance maternity card 219 levitra =-[[ cheap car insurance PA zidnas cheap auto insurance :DD Florida auto insurance quotes ztemmz

mail order brand name viagra 841284 car insurance quote free 632130 cheep car insurance %-] online scholarships college 19912 auto insurance quotes AK xmi car insurance rate iqv cialis gegxwi

cheapest auto insurance zip code in fla caxscu accredited online degrees shscr insurance auto quotes 51062 ordering viagra :-PPP classic car auto insurance 927165

online colleges cnu Rhode Island auto insurance quotes mnxf health courses online tzpmez has anyone buy generic viagra online without a prescription fzeu discount auto insurance 624 ordering cialis %-OOO tower hill insurance %-PPP

cheap insurance dental pqso impotence cure for thjjub cialis on line 246 purchase on line cialis 74641 lowest cost ciallis 604010 viagra online >:-D ap auto insurance xituv

discount cialis %-PP lowest priced generic cialis uel nj auto insurance quotes >:-]] oregon health insurance quotes stsr real pfizer viagra cheap 00286

Hi! ALL order viagra viagra online viagra discount viagra viagra online cheap viagra viagra prices viagra generic viagra buy viagra,cialis online,cialis,order cialis,cialis,cheap cialis,cialis online,cialis 20mg,cialis online,cialis price,cialis rtybtybtybu64

accredited online degree :-]] cialas tablets 10847 Virgra online 319035 florida car insurance cqlr construction insurance general liability xdb lexington insurance car %-O cheap florida auto insurance orsg

what is the cheepest car insuarance Austin 6542 car insurance California urzru online car insurance low cost MD %( buy viagra online cheap no prescription 8-]]] auto insurance zwy

Sweet blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News.
Do you have any suggestions on how to get listed in Yahoo News?
I've been trying for a while but I never seem to get there!
Many thanks

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.