Bacevich: Vietnam vs. Munich, and Creating an "Iraq/Afghanistan Syndrome"

Campaigning for the Democratic Presidential nomination in 2008, Senator Barack Obama said: "I don't want to just end the war, but I want to end the mindset that got us into war in the first place."

But as Andrew Bacevich notes in his new book, "Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War," as President, Barack Obama has done the opposite: he has promoted and acted on behalf of the mindset that leads to war.

Most prominently, President Obama has so far missed every major exit ramp for starting to get out of Afghanistan, instead escalating militarily and "doubling down" on "counterinsurgency" in Afghanistan - Vietnam 2.0 - even as the war has become increasingly unpopular in the United States - as it has been in Afghanistan and in the rest of the world. The majority of Americans, three-quarters of Democrats, and three-fifths of House Democrats want President Obama to establish a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. forces. But the White House so far refuses to even publicly discuss such a move, even as it claims to support "Afghan-led reconciliation" with leaders of the Afghan Taliban, which, if real, almost certainly would require a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign forces, a key demand of Afghan insurgents.

This is all the more striking as the Administration celebrates the drawdown of U.S. forces from Iraq, because the centerpiece of the present relationship between the U.S. government and the Iraqi government is an agreement stipulating the total withdrawal of U.S. forces from the country by the end of 2011. That which is now the centerpiece of U.S. relations with Iraq is still mostly taboo for discussion among the "national security elite" regarding Afghanistan: a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign forces.

Bacevich puts President Obama's stunning reversal in historical context: since Presidents Truman and Eisenhower, there has been a "Washington consensus" among the national security and foreign policy establishment for a policy of permanent war and for "power projection" around the globe to prepare for aggressive war. To follow through on his campaign promise to "end the mindset that got us into war" would compel President Obama to confront this establishment, something he obviously was not prepared to do. Instead, President Obama signaled to the national security establishment that they should ignore his campaign rhetoric, and that he would act instead on the broad imperial commitments of every President since Truman and Eisenhower, not only doubling down in Afghanistan but trying to declare the military budget off limits for cuts, escalating military attacks in Pakistan that have never been authorized by Congress, establishing political ground for a future war against Iran by pretending that Iran's enrichment of uranium constitutes a threat to the personal security of Americans, helping to bring down the Japanese Prime Minister rather than submit to the popular Japanese demand to withdraw U.S. marines from Okinawa, supporting in deed if not initially in word the military coup in Honduras, establishing a new military basing agreement with Colombia, and replacing President Bush's European "missile defense" with "missile defense lite," just to name a few examples.

But Bacevich is an academic, so unlike President Obama he has no reason to worship at the altar of the national security establishment. Indeed, "Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War" is a call for Americans to reject the Washington consensus for permanent war, global counterinsurgency and global military power projection, and to demand instead that America "come home," as Martin Luther King called for in 1967, and focus on resolving its own domestic problems rather than act as a self-appointed global police and occupation force.

Bacevich notes that a key feature of the permanent war intellectual, political, and media culture is that foreign policy fiascoes can't be allowed to provoke fundamental questions about the direction of U.S. policy. Any "mistakes," if they are acknowledged at all, are mistakes of execution. Vietnam was an aberration - no lessons that would fundamentally change policy are to be drawn. Indeed, the challenge of Vietnam is always to remove it from national discussion: to end the "Vietnam syndrome" that made Americans rightly skeptical about claims that the use of military force is morally justified and in Americans' interest. The only historical analogy the Washington consensus establishment likes is Munich 1938. Our enemies are always the next Hitler, and any American who opposes the U.S. use of military force is always Neville Chamberlain. Our leaders' intentions are always good, and anyone who doubts their inherent nobility is by definition an extremist.

Just as a previous generation of national security establishment leaders worked to rid America of the "Vietnam Syndrome" that made us rightly skeptical of claims for the morality and utility of war, so now we can expect leaders of the national security establishment to work to ensure that we don't develop an "Iraq Syndrome" or "Afghanistan Syndrome" that would make us rightly skeptical, for example, of arguments for military confrontation with Iran. Bacevich's book, one hopes, will help Americans develop and sustain this virtuous and noble Syndrome.

Bacevich's story is compelling in part because of his personal history. As he recounts in the introduction, he was a "late bloomer" in his understanding and critique of the American empire. Bacevich was an officer for many years in the U.S. Army, and has described himself as a "Catholic conservative."

This is important, because an important buttress in support of the permanent war and global military power projection policy of the Washington consensus is the current near-monolithic support for permanent war and global military power projection in the dominant institutions of the Republican Party. While polls show the majority of Republican voters tend to support the war in Afghanistan, for example, that support is not monolithic: a substantial minority of Republicans - 32%, according to a recent CBS poll - agrees with the super-majority of Democrats who think the U.S. should establish a timetable for military withdrawal from Afghanistan. But this substantial minority of Republicans who favor a timetable for withdrawal is virtually unrepresented in Washington. On July 1, when the House considered the McGovern-Obey-Jones amendment which would have required the President to establish a timetable for withdrawal, it was supported by 153 Democrats and 9 Republicans - 61% of the Democrats voting and 5% of the Republicans voting. Democratic voters who want to end the war were underrepresented, since 73% of Democratic voters support a timetable for withdrawal, as opposed to 61% of House Democrats. But Republican voters who want to end the war were far more spectacularly underrepresented, since 32% of Republican voters support a timetable for withdrawal, as opposed to 5% of House Republicans. Crucially, even if antiwar Democratic voters were fully represented in the House - if 73% of House Democrats had voted for a withdrawal timetable, instead of 61% - the amendment would still have failed, if only 5% of House Republicans supported it.

So a key task for ending the war - and preventing future wars, such as a future war with Iran for which the political groundwork is now being laid - is breaking the Republican political monolith in support of war. But this is a task for which the U.S. "peace movement," as it presently exists, is ill-suited, since it largely consists of "progressives" without much institutional ability to appeal to or mobilize potentially anti-war Republicans.

Yet, the current state of affairs is by no means set in stone. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, a key supporter of the war, recently told CNN his biggest fear is an "unholy alliance" of conservatives and liberals that could join forces to try to end the war.

This is why Bacevich's new book is potentially important for the U.S. peace movement. Get the book, read it, give it to a Republican friend, and talk to them about it. Join Just Foreign Policy on September 24th for a "Virtual Brown Bag" with Andrew Bacevich, and try to virtually bring your Republican friend.

If every American who wants to live in peace with the world rather than constantly bombing, invading, and occupying it could just recruit one Republican to oppose the permanent war, Martin Luther King's other dream could be fulfilled: America could "come home."

5mg dysfunction erectile sildenafil nrlne florida auto insurance :-))) online pharmacy antibiotics cipro 4498

10 mg generic prozac without prescription uzebd a auto insurance 347 cheapest cialis 68053

prednisone 97483 viagra on line >:-O sildenafil vardenafil and tadalafil =[[ auto insurance quotes wxbzli online college zvr

Houston car insurance quotes :O how does viagra work 96477 car insureance 55487 cheapest car insurance mxkzo car insurance qoutes xrvli buy cialis 094429 auto insurance quotes Jacksonville 341

buy viagra in usa :-(( kamagra viagra cialis apcalis 8P cheap california auto insurance 931391 ordering cialis online gfac cialis tablet 44148 auto insurance quotes Alaska nkxgb cheap car insurance cqqbdi

buy viagra :OO online colleges 83478 auto insurance quotes lwreuo viagra online =[[[ Cheyenne auto insurance quotes 162835

auto insurance quotes nj 140 cheap auto insurance =-DD cheap car insurance =-( levitra mxz estimator car insurance 937858 viagra levitra 164088 Seattle auto insurance quotes gfjqkt

physical therapy online classes egxk auto insurance quotes =OOO mail order brand name viagra :-( best starting poker hands =] car insurance quotes 581200

auto insurance quotes %PPP buy generic cialis %-[[[ free quotes auto insurance yrda cialis sale gwuc order non generic cialis %-O

Hi! ALL viagra viagra online without prescription viagra viagra viagra cheap viagra viagra prices viagra sale buy viagra cheap viagra,cialis online,cialis price,cialis online,cialis,cialis generic,buy cialis,cialis 20mg,generic cialis,cialis,cialis reviews rtybtybtybu64

Amazon online Stops Marriage having Idaho Web marketers [url=]air jordan 4 toro bravo[/url] air jordan 4 toro bravo

auto insurance quotes 165 best cialis online store 4626 insurance medicare drug 8-DD cheap generic cialis qtjg Viagra Cialis Together :D sildenafil :]]] cheap car insurance in nj horli

auto insurance quotes mazjjd degree in online social work 2007 auto insurance quotes %[[ viagra %(( auto insurance 998888

compare car insurance TN :-]]] cheap car insurance quotes online %-)) womens car insurance cheap 4072 free car insurance sgvczm Dicounted Auto Insurance 52907 car insurance quotes =DD cialis online >:OO

free car insurance 916 texas auto insurance ibg compare auto insurane quotes michigan New Jersey :-( insurance buy on line car 349751 impotence mental 8PPP cialis on line sales %-PP

cheap cialis generic >:-(( cheap auto insurance az tiea viaraga 601 cialis :((( compare florida car insurance anonymously =-OOO car insurance quotes 721722

Detroit cheap auto insurance ohtr cheap online car insurance quotes Birmingham fpwjgh ate quote insurance car jff Florida free online car insurance quote jzi accutane 20mg 682082 www cheap car insurance florida 044256 cheap insurance :-)

I like your post a lot! You should write some more on this!Great job coming with such terrific post!


I’m very glad to found this website because; it carries awesome and actually good data in favor of readers.


Thanks for putting an effort to publish this information and for sharing this with us.


Bacevich: Vietnam vs. Munich, and Creating an "Iraq/Afghanistan Syndrome" | Just Foreign Policy Nike LunarGlide 4

They are providing effective remedy to see near family members affiliates moving and other moving situations alike; all at genuine and cheap costs.
Visit for Best info:
Packers and Movers Pune @
Packers and Movers Hyderabad @
Packers and Movers Mumbai @

Professional packers and movers Mumbai centered companies are providing a wide range of useful alternatives for people who want to shift within Mumbai or want to shift from this city to somewhere else.
Packers and Movers Mumbai @
Packers and Movers Chennai @
Packers and Movers Delhi @
Packers and Movers Bangalore @

Having used dedicated choosing who gets qualified on all the factors of overall look and shifting, the company succeeds in offering alternatives which are at par from what is known as a normal deal.
Packers and Movers in Thane @
Packers and Movers in Amritsar @
Packers and Movers in Noida @
Packers and Movers in Navi Mumbai @

Having used dedicated choosing who gets qualified on all the factors of overall look and shifting, the company succeeds in offering alternatives which are at par from what is known as a normal deal.
Packers and Movers in Thane @
Packers and Movers in Amritsar @
Packers and Movers in Noida @
Packers and Movers in Navi Mumbai @

Outset from attempting to defending up at re-arranging the same at the holiday position, supremacy is seen in every taken level that perfectionists take. Moving organizations and Packers Ghaziabad have been offering all the famous customers and also developing up a series simultaneously to validate their impartial and perfect execute.
Packers and Movers in Jalandhar @
Packers and Movers in Ghaziabad @
Packers and Movers in Faridabad @
Packers and Movers in Chandigarh @

Running along with Unloading Items and services: Launching along with unloading is really a essential level such as splitting as well as demand heedful coping with.
Packers and Movers Hyderabad or
Packers and Movers Bangalore or
Packers and Movers Pune or

Knowledgeable new home buy employees can quickly efficiently pile as well as sell products. That they thoroughly deal with the particular obligations to obtain splitting harm cost-free.
Packers and Movers Mumbai or
Packers and Movers Delhi or
Packers and Movers Gurgaon or

Packers and Movers Chennai or
Packers and Movers Noida or
Packers and Movers Thane or
Packers and Movers Navi Mumbai or

Packers and Movers Chennai or
Packers and Movers Noida or
Packers and Movers Thane or
Packers and Movers Navi Mumbai or

This article is really fantastic and thanks for sharing the valuable post.

Thanks for all your information.Website is very nice and informative content.

This article is really fantastic and thanks for sharing the valuable post.

This article is really fantastic and thanks for sharing the valuable post.

Thanks for all your information.Website is very nice and informative content.

This article is really fantastic and thanks for sharing the valuable post/

Thanks for all your information.Website is very nice and informative content.

This article is really fantastic and thanks for sharing the valuable post.

I really enjoyed reading your article. I found this as an informative and interesting post, so i
think it is very useful and knowledgeable. I would like to thank you for the effort you have made in writing this article.

Thanks for post this helpful post - Please visit for More information about:

Thanks for Nice and Informative Post. This article is really contains lot more information about This Topic

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.