Wikileaks Honduras: State Dept. Busted on Support of Coup

By July 24, 2009, the U.S. government was totally clear about the basic facts of what took place in Honduras on June 28, 2009. The U.S. embassy in Tegucigalpa sent a cable to Washington with subject: "Open and Shut: The Case of the Honduran Coup," asserting that "there is no doubt" that the events of June 28 "constituted an illegal and unconstitutional coup." The Embassy listed arguments being made by supporters of the coup to claim its legality, and dismissed them thus: "none ... has any substantive validity under the Honduran constitution." The Honduran military clearly had no legal authority to remove President Zelaya from office or from Honduras, the Embassy said, and their action - the Embassy described it as an "abduction" and "kidnapping" - was clearly unconstitutional.

It is inconceivable that any top U.S. official responsible for U.S. policy in Honduras was not familiar with the contents of the July 24 cable, which summarized the assessment of the U.S. Embassy in Honduras on key facts that were politically disputed by supporters of the coup regime. The cable was addressed to Tom Shannon, then Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs; Harold Koh, the State Department's Legal Adviser; and Dan Restrepo, Senior Director for Western Hemisphere Affairs at the National Security Council. The cable was sent to the White House and to Secretary of State Clinton.

But despite the fact that the U.S. government was crystal clear on what had transpired, the U.S. did not immediately cut off all aid to Honduras except "democracy assistance," as required by U.S. law.

Instead, a month after this cable was sent, the State Department, in its public pronouncements, pretended that the events of June 28 - in particular, "who did what to whom" and the constitutionality of these actions - were murky and needed further study by State Department lawyers, despite the fact that the State Department's top lawyer, Harold Koh, knew exactly "who did what to whom" and that these actions were unconstitutional at least one month earlier. The State Department, to justify its delay in carrying out U.S. law, invented a legal distinction between a "coup" and a "military coup," claiming that the State Department's lawyers had to determine whether a "military coup" took place, because only that determination would meet the legal threshold for the aid cutoff.


QUESTION: And so - sorry, just a follow-up. If this is a coup - the State Department considers this a coup, what's the next step? And I mean, there is a legal framework on the U.S. laws dealing with countries that are under coup d'état? I mean, what's holding you guys [back from taking] other measures according [to] the law?

SENIOR STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL ONE: I think what you're referring to, Mr. Davila, is whether or not this is - has been determined to be a military coup. And you're correct that there are provisions in our law that have to be applied if it is determined that this is a military coup. And frankly, our lawyers are looking at that exact question. And when we get the answer to that, you are right, there will be things that - if it is determined that this was a military coup, there will be things that will kick in.

As you know, on the ground, there's a lot of discussion about who did what to whom and what things were constitutional or not, which is why our lawyers are really looking at the event as we understand them in order to come out with the accurate determination.

But the July 24 cable shows that this was nonsense. The phrase "military coup" occurs nowhere in the document, a remarkable omission in a cable from the Embassy presenting the Embassy's analysis of the June 28 events, their constitutionality and legality one month after the fact, if that were a crucial distinction in assessing U.S. policy. And indeed, initial press reports on the statements of top U.S. officials in response to the coup made no such distinction, using the descriptions "coup" and "military coup" interchangeably.

Why did the State Department drag its feet, pretending that facts which it knew to be clear-cut were murky? Why didn't the State Department speak publicly after July 24 with the same moral clarity as the July 24 cable from the Embassy in Honduras? Had the State Department shared publicly the Embassy's clear assessment of the June 28 events after July 24, history might have turned out differently, because supporters of the coup in the United States - including Republican Members of Congress and media talking heads - continued to dispute basic facts about the coup which the US Embassy in Honduras had reported were not subject to reasonable dispute, and U.S. media reporting on the coup continued to describe these facts as subject to reasonable dispute, long after the Embassy had firmly declared that they were not.

As the Center for Economic and Policy Research noted in an August 2009 report, in the previous 12 months the U.S. had responded to other coups by cutting U.S. aid within days. In these cases - in Africa - there was no lengthy deliberation on whether a "coup" was a "military coup."

What was the difference?

A key difference was that Honduras is in Central America, "our backyard," so different rules applied. Top officials in Washington supported the political aims of the coup. They did not nominally support the means of the coup, as far as we know, but they supported its political end: the removal of the ability of President Zelaya and his supporters to pursue a meaningful reform project in Honduras. On the other hand, they were politically constrained not to support the coup openly, since they knew it to be illegal and unconstitutional. Thus, they pursued a "diplomatic compromise" which would "restore constitutional order" while achieving the coup's central political aim: removal of the ability of President Zelaya and his supporters to pursue a meaningful reform project in Honduras. The effect of their efforts at "diplomatic compromise" was to allow the coup to stand, a result that these supporters of the coup's political aims were evidently content with.

Why does this matter now?

First, the constitutional and political crisis in Honduras is ongoing, and the failure of the U.S. to take immediate, decisive action in response to the coup was a significant cause of the ongoing crisis. After nominally opposing the coup, and slowly and fitfully implementing partial sanctions against the coup regime in a way that did not convince the coup regime that the U.S. was serious, the U.S. moved to support elections under the coup regime which were not recognized by the rest of the hemisphere, and today the U.S. is lobbying for the government created by that disputed election to be readmitted to the Organization of American States, in opposition to most of the rest of the hemisphere, despite ongoing, major violations of human rights in Honduras, about which the U.S. is doing essentially nothing.

Second, the relationship of actual U.S. policy - as opposed to rhetorical pronouncements - to democracy in the region is very much a live issue from Haiti to Bolivia.

Yesterday there was an election in Haiti. This election was funded by the U.S., despite the fact that major parties were excluded from participation by the government's electoral council, a fact that Republican and Democratic Members of Congress, in addition to NGOs, complained about without result. The Washington Post reports that the election ended with "nearly all the major candidates calling for the results to be tossed out amid 'massive fraud.'": "12 of the 19 candidates on Sunday's ballot appeared together at a raucous afternoon news conference to accuse the government of President Rene Preval of trying to steal the election and install his chosen candidate, Jude Celestin."

Yesterday's election in Haiti had the fingerprints of the U.S. government all over it. It was funded by the U.S. "Security" for the election was purportedly provided by UN troops, paid for by the U.S. And the crucial historical context of the election was the 2004 coup that deposed democratically elected President Jean Bertrand Aristide, a coup engineered by the U.S. with years of economic destruction clearly intended to topple the elected government.

Last week, Bolivian President Evo Morales called out the U.S. for its recent history of supporting coups in the region.

AP's treatment of President Morales' remarks was instructive:


Morales also alleged U.S. involvement in coup attempts or political upheaval in Venezuela in 2002, Honduras in 2009 and Ecuador in 2010.

"The empire of the United States won," in Honduras, Morales said, a reference to the allegations of former Honduran President Manuel Zelaya that the U.S. was behind his ouster.

"The people of the Americas in Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador, we won," Morales continued. "We are three to one with the United States. Let's see what the future brings."

U.S. officials have repeatedly denied involvement in all of those cases and critics of the United States have produced no clear evidence. [my emphasis]

It's certainly true that critics have produced "no clear evidence" of U.S. "involvement" in any of these cases - if your standard for "clear evidence" of U.S. "involvement" is a US government document that dictated in advance everything that subsequently happened. But this would be like saying that critics have produced "no clear evidence" for the Armenian Genocide because researchers haven't yet found a Turkish Mein Kampf. [Some who dispute that there was an "Armenian Genocide" do actually claim something like this - "there is no proof of a plan" - but claims like this are generally not taken seriously by U.S. media - except when the U.S. government is an author of the crime, and the crime is recent.]

In the case of the coup in Venezuela in 2002, we know the following:

- groups in Venezuela that participated in the coup had been supported financially and politically by the U.S.

- the CIA had advance knowledge of the plans for a coup, and did nothing to warn the Venezuelan government; nor did the US do anything meaningful to try to stop the coup.

- although the US knew in advance about the plans for a coup, when these events played out, the US tried to claim that there was no coup.

- the US pushed for international recognition of the coup government.

- the International Monetary Fund, which would not take such action without advance approval from the United States, announced its willingness to support the coup government a few hours after the coup took place.

These facts about U.S. government "involvement" in the coup in Venezuela are documented in Oliver Stone's recent movie, South of the Border. This is why it's so important for as many Americans as possible to see this movie: because there are basic facts about the relationship of actual U.S. government policies - as opposed to rhetoric - to democracy in Latin America that major U.S. media simply cannot be counted upon to report straight. In order to successfully agitate for meaningful reform of U.S. government policy in Latin America, Americans have to know what the actual policy of the U.S. government has been, something they are unlikely to learn from major U.S. media.

And this is why Just Foreign Policy is urging Americans to organize house parties on December 10 - Human Rights Day - to watch South of the Border. You can sign up to host a screening here.

Here is a clip from South of the Border, in which Scott Wilson, formerly Foreign Editor of the Washington Post, describes the "involvement" of the U.S. in the coup in Venezuela:

And here is a clip from South of the Border in which President Morales talks with Oliver Stone about the role of the media:


Oliver Stone: "Now [Morales] joining the Hugo ranks, becoming more the 'bad left' in the American media."

President Morales: "The media will always try to criminalize the fight against neoliberalism, colonialism, and imperialism. It's almost normal. The worst enemy I have is the media."

South of the Border Clip #2 from Cinema Libre Studio on Vimeo.

Robert Naiman is Policy Director at Just Foreign Policy.

I'm amazed, I have to admit. Seldom do I encounter a blog that's both educative
and interesting, and without a doubt, you've hit the nail on the head.

The problem is something which too few folks are speaking intelligently about.
I'm very happy that I came across this during my
hunt for something relating to this.

your Pers ? Nlichkeit und dr ? Ngen mit entschlossenheit . Alle stirbt mit gesundem Wenig coach outlet Menschenverstand nike air max 1 premium Werden discount oakley sunglasses Sie nike air max in oakley sunglasses sale shop gro Ray Ban 3025 ? Nike Air Jordan 4 E cheap nike air max ltd H Cheap Christian Louboutin ? shop ray ban sunglasses Henne air max thea zu Ralph Lauren UK ergreifen lauren by ralph lauren bedding , ray ban sunglasses zu cheap air jordan shoes Einem Cheap Oakley Sunglasses Trendsetter niek Air Jordan 11 in Nike Air Max 90 der oakley sunglsses Modus quality cheap coach purse f��r nike Air Max Ray Ban UK Shop />sonst cheap ray bans sunglasses hat die Troopelect shopping ray ban sunglasses ihn oakley eyeglasses Leutnant air max 2015 ? wholesale oakley sunglasses " coach handbags 2014 " Ah b&l ray ban usa ain air jordan sale ' ray ban sunglasses nie cheap ray ban 2140 dat shopping ray ban sunglasses uk figgered oakley outlet aus Ray Ban 3025 Sunglasses 62Mm , Ray Ban Outlet mahseff Ralph Lauren UK ", nike air max 1 antwortete Air Jordan 4 Retro Jeems Ray Ban Sunglasses UK , ray ban sunglasses for sale ungest?rt Nike Air Max 90 Shoes von ralph lauren outlet seinen air jordan 5 for sale Master Ray Ban Sale finsteren ray ban 2140 wayfarer Blick Sunglasses Ray Ban On Sale . oakley sunglasses outlet store "Schau nike air max shoes store mir ralph lauren bedding outlet ter nike air jordan 5 lak Air Jordan 4 Cement dey'd discount oakley sunglasses ' Ray Ban Outlet Store eln nike air max ltd Sie nike air jordan shoes store alle nike air max 1 essential cheap ralph lauren online store uk />sollte air max ltd klug Genug nike air max thea zu oakley sunglasses cheap mischen ray ban sunglasses sale und Air Max anzupassen ray ban usa sunglasses Waden nike air max thea premium Kost��me fake ray bans und ray ban 4147 sunglasses vermeiden ray ban sunglasses rb3025 , air jordan shoes for sale sterben ray ban sunglusses Gleichen coach handbags Kost��me air jordan 5 retro Alltag Air Jordan 11 Release Date , coach handbags on sale INDEM SIE Louboutin Online Eine Notiz Air Jordan 11 Retro von ray ban for sale dm, coach purses war nike air max 1 2014 er air jordan shoes tr christian louboutin online ? Gt ray ban sunglasses online jeden fake ray bans for sale tag Oakley Sunglasses . Die Modus - Ikone sollte Sich Musikersuche ohne Risiko einkaufen Bem��hungen . Inhalt der Webseite spielt sterben Wichtigste Rolle bei der herstellung der Webseite popul ? R. Die Webseite sollte Nicht -Nur gut gestaltet und Sie im Bein? Nein, sie nur f��r alte Doc Fontaine geschickt zu kleiden andasked coach purses outlet es dem Arzt , was Tony Ziel fehlte . Sagte, sie ahnen Licker wurde verderben seine ray-ban sunglasses Treffsicherheit nike air max 1 2014 . authentic nike air jordan shoes Denken 2014 cheap ray ban outlet stores Sie cheap coach purse fake ray bans uk /> ray ban 4147 review
related links:

Angeboten Zugang . Sollten SIE zu Einem Online - Abschluss f��r diesen Kurs verfolgen m ? Chten , k ? Nnen SIE Erwarten , ?hm H?hle Zugriff Markt auf E-Learning - Werkzeuge und zugang zu Fern />"Ich dachte, ich auch. "Person, der Gesundheit und der Art der Arbeit Ein Individuum tut ? . Life Insurance Moncler Coats NZ IST Eine der free run 2 g��nstigsten M ? Glichkeiten , ?h Ihre Familie wholesale nba jerseys zu Sch��tzen , WENN Moncler Outlet Online Einkommen das. Das Louis Vuitton wallets />Brent drehte sich in Louis Vuitton Outlet Online den Sattel und an den Br?utigam Neger bezeichnet.Nike LunarEclipse />aus Kreativit ? T louis vuitton handbags , ? Sthetik , Louis Vuitton Outlet Online Gleichgewicht , Farbe, Harmonie Christian Louboutin Shoes Outlet und Einpr ? Gsamkeit . Besucher FINDEN Eine High Heel Shoes store Hervorragende Bilanz Bereich zwischen Effizienz und Erschwinglichkeit Markt auf Blue unvorhergesehenen chanel outlet online problemen . Nachdem gute Louis Vuitton Outlet stores Krankenversicherung IST Eine der Besten , Involvenzberater, sterben nike air max SIE f��r Ihre Familie cheap michael kors handbags Machen Kann . Brauchen new balance outlet online "Professional Web Design mit barbour factory outlet store Personal sterben Online LV Bags -Weg zu studieren ? Christian Louboutin online store Nun , da JEDER Nicht angehender Student hat Zeit sterben oder sterben new balance factory outlet Zug ? Nglichkeit zum michael kors outlet store online sale Campus Physisch Anwesend zu Louis Vuitton Sale studieren , DerVry Universit ? T einen />available Eine Karriere ALS gucci handbags Professioneller entwicklung Sachverst ? louboutin outlet Ndigen oder Unabh ? Ngige Berater in verschiedenen Michael Kors outlet store Bereichen wachsenden Bildungs ??- Technologie . Aber Warum louis vuitton outlet w ? Hlen , Michael Kors satchel bag ?h
related links:

I believe that is among the so much significant information for me.
And i'm glad reading your article. But wanna statement
on some basic things, The site taste is wonderful, the articles is
really excellent : D. Excellent process, cheers

chanel bags,
flat iron,
converse shoes,
ferragamo outlet,
gucci belt,
hollister kids,
insanity workout calendar,
jimmy choo shoes,
air jordan shoes,
juicy couture,
juicy couture outlet,
kate spade,
louis vuitton outlet,
michael kors outlet online,
michael kors,
michael kors purses,
michael kors,
michael kors outlet online sale,
north face jackets,
oakley outlet,
pandora charms,
prada outlet,
prada shoes for men,
ray ban sunglasses outlet,
rolex watches,
swarovski outlet,
the north face outlet,
tiffany jewelry,
tiffany co,
true religion jeans outlet,
true religion outlet,
ugg boots,
uggs outlet,
ugg australia,
ugg boots clearance,
cheap oakley,
oakley vault,
ralph lauren outlet online,
ralph lauren outlet,,
toms shoes,
toms outlet,
christian louboutin shoes,
tory burch handbags,
gucci belt,
longchamp bags,,
hermes birkin bag,
cheap nfl jerseys,
beats headphones,
beats by dr dre,
hair straightener,
ray ban sunglasses,
michael kors bags,
michael kors uk,
louis vuitton outlet,
ralph lauren outlet,
nike running,
omega watches,
dresses for weddings,
pandora sale,
thomas sabo,
christian louboutin,
air huarache,
roshe run,
north face uk,
louis vuitton canada,
jordan shoes,
air jordan,
air jordan retro,
nike outlet,
cheap nike shoes,
nike sneakers,
air max 2015,
nike air max 2014,
nike air max 2015,
nike free,
nike running shoes,
supra shoes,
new balance,
mont blanc,
salvatore ferragamo outlet,
mcm bags,
nike mercurial,
celine bags,
roshe runs,
roshe run,
vans shoes,
timberland outlet,
iphone 4s cases,
softball bats,
babyliss pro,
louis vuitton handbags,
burberry outlet,
christian louboutin shoes,
louis vuitton outlet stores,
prada outlet,
michael kors outlet online sale,
michael kors handbags,
tommy hilfiger polos,
mcm handbags,
moncler outlet,
kate spade sale,
barbour quilted jacket,
salvatore ferragamo shoes,
canada goose outlet,
louis vuitton outlet online,
burberry outlet,
hollister clothes,
north face outlet online,
barbour jackets,
north face jackets outlet,
north face jackets women,
polo ralph lauren outlet online,
ralph lauren outlet,
ralph lauren outlet online,
beats by dre outlet,
louis vuitton outlet online,
gucci outlet,
longchamp outlet,
moncler clearance,
ralph lauren shirts,
hermes handbags,
beats by dre outlet,
coach factory outlet online,,,
michael kors outlet,,
oakley vault,
hermes bags,
marc jacobs bags sale,
nike air max,
woolrich clearance,
coach outlet store,
coach bags outlet,
coach handbags outlet,
gucci sale,
coach outlet online,
michael kors outlet store,
gucci handbags,
the north face outlet,
ugg boots clearance,
tommy hilfiger coupons,
uggs outlet,
louis vuitton outlet,
calvin kleins outlet,
christian louboutin,
jordan retro,
burberry outlet,
abercrombie fitch,

Some programs also are linked into your private home's wiring, heating or lighting techniques and
use your mobile phone or laptop to manage them.

Hello! I just wish to offer you a huge thumbs up for your
great information you've got right here on this post. I'll be returning to your blog for more soon.

serious damage to the whole of the market order of fair competition, leading to trade power up,

(the Gucci Belts evening news on November 4, 2013) summed up in four word yisheng media this year to the style of transcripts: one is other; Drop throughout;

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • No HTML tags allowed
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Enter the characters shown in the image.