Archive for April, 2009

JFP News, 4/30: White House Rejects Deadline for Iran Talks

Thursday, April 30th, 2009

Just Foreign Policy News
April 30, 2009

NYT: Americans Support Obama’s Outreach to Iran and Cuba
Americans support President Obama’s outreach to Iran and Cuba. The New York Times reports, based on a recent poll: "a majority, 53 percent, said they favored establishing diplomatic relations with Iran, while two-thirds favored Obama’s plans to thaw relations with Cuba." But if you look closer at the questions and responses, the results are even more striking - not only do Americans support’s Obama’s efforts so far - they support things that Obama hasn’t done yet, and hasn’t yet promised to do.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/nyt-americans-support-oba_b_192452.html

Reform US Foreign Policy. Pass the Employee Free Choice Act.
Over the long term, we’ll never have a foreign policy that truly reflects the values and interests of the majority of Americans until working people in the U.S. - the majority of the population - have more political power.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/27-4

Help us build for a Just Foreign Policy
Your financial contributions to Just Foreign Policy help us create opportunities for Americans to advocate for a just foreign policy.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate.html

Summary:
U.S./Top News
1) The White House rejected the notion of putting timelines on its engagement with Iran and indicated its efforts could take a significant amount of time, the Jerusalem Post reports. Israel has argued for a time limit. But a National Security Council spokesman said "it’s not appropriate at this time to be trying to establish timetables, but rather seeing how the engagement can move forward."

2) A new poll finds three-quarters of Americans think Israel should not build settlements in the Palestinian territories, up 23 points from 2002, WorldPublicOpinion.org reports. Even among respondents who say they sympathize with Israel more than the Palestinians, 64% say Israel should not build settlements in the West Bank. Opposition to settlements is found among majorities of Republicans, Democrats and independents. Those who followed the issue closely oppose settlements by the same margin as those who don’t.

3) 50 Members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus pressed President Obama on the priorities for Afghanistan expressed in the supplemental, Katrina vanden Heuvel reports for The Nation. Rep. Grijalva said the Caucus expressed concern that "we’re making the same mistake - everything is going into militarization, not institutional reform, human and capital development, healthcare." They pointed out to the President that the counterinsurgency strategy calls for 80 percent of the resources to be devoted to non-military/political solutions, and 20 percent to the military. But the supplemental devotes $76 billion for the military and approximately $7 billion for diplomatic efforts and foreign aid. Beyond the supplemental, the Caucus cited four other priorities with regard to Afghanistan and Iraq: no permanent bases; a timetable for exit; the aforementioned 80-20 allocation of resources; and the need to cease using drones due to civilian casualties.

4) Obama’s ability to deliver on commitments to close tax loopholes that promote offshoring and re-regulate the financial sector would be dealt a sharp blow if the Panama trade agreement is passed, says Public Citizen in a new report. The Panama deal includes the controversial private "investor-state" enforcement system, which would give new powers to hundreds of thousands of private investors from around the world that are registered and have operations in Panama. Some of the largest recipients of U.S. federal procurement contracts and money under the TARP, including Citigroup and AIG, have dozens of subsidiaries in Panama that would be empowered with expansive new rights if the FTA is implemented. These firms have been among the top advocates for the Panama FTA.

5) The Obama administration is attempting to head off efforts in Congress to place tough conditions on the assistance package it is seeking for Pakistan, the Politico reports. Pentagon officials said conditions being proposed in Congress could "severely constrain" the U.S. strategy for Pakistan. Rep. Berman said his bill doesn’t include ‘rigid’ or ‘inflexible’ conditions, noting that the President can waive its restrictions if it is "vital to national security."

6) The first known case of swine flu emerged in a Mexican village where residents have long complained about the smell and flies from a nearby pig farm run by the U.S.-based Smithfield Corporation, the Times of London reports.

7) House Judiciary Committee Democrats have called for a special prosecutor to investigate interrogations of terrorism suspects, AP reports. They say a special counsel’s investigation would insulate the department from accusations that the investigation was politically inspired. A coalition including the ACLU, MoveOn, and the Center for Constitutional Rights delivered petitions to Attorney General Holder demanding he name an independent counsel.

Israel/Palestine
8) Little reconstruction has taken place in Gaza since Israel’s offensive, NPR reports. The UN is calling on Israel to allow reconstruction materials into Gaza, but Israel is resisting the appeal. John Ging of UNRWA says rocket attacks have diminished in recent weeks, but Israel has not eased its blockade. "There’s nothing going on in terms of reconstruction because the crossings are still closed. That’s the key to all the misery here," Ging says.

Ecuador
9) The US congratulated Ecuador’s President Correa on his election victory and voiced hope for cooperation after a rocky patch, AFP reports.

Colombia
10) Britain has ended nearly a decade of military aid to Colombia’s armed forces after accusations of gross violations of human rights, the Guardian reports. While welcoming the UK’s decision as "a step in the right direction", the London-based group Justice for Colombia said that the "more offensive" elements of British military aid, labelled counter-narcotics assistance, were not affected.

Mexico
11) Mexico’s Senate approved a bill decriminalizing possession of small amounts of narcotics for personal use, in order to free resources to fight violent drug cartels, Reuters reports. Mexico’s Congress passed a similar proposal in 2006 but the bill was vetoed under pressure from the US. The bill now goes to the lower house.

Contents:
U.S./Top News
1) White House rejects notion of Iran deadlines
Hilary Leila Krieger, Jerusalem Post, Apr. 29, 2009
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1239710821164&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

The White House rejected the notion of putting timelines on its engagement with Iran Wednesday and indicated that its efforts could take a significant amount of time.

While not opposing talks with Iran, Israel has been concerned that the Islamic republic would use the opportunity of negotiations to run out the clock on its nuclear program, and would like to see a time limit set to prevent such a scenario as well as to ratchet up pressure for Iranian compliance.

But White House National Security Council spokesman Mike Hammer told foreign journalists Wednesday that "it’s not appropriate at this time to be trying to establish timetables, but rather seeing how the engagement can move forward."

He said the US was not looking for "talk for the sake of talk," but that "there are opportunities there for us to engage with the Iranian government."

So far, he acknowledged that Iranian reactions to US overtures had been "mixed," as Iranian leaders had at times welcomed US President Barack Obama’s efforts to appeal to the Iranian government, and at others put down such moves. But he took that as an indication that engagement, which he defended as "worthwhile," could be slow going.

"We are in a process that we expect will take some time," he said. "We’ve had a difficult - at best - relationship in the past with Iran, and we’re looking to see what is possible. But we’re under no illusions that there will be any change in the near term."

How the US and Israel each approach Iran is expected to be a major subject of conversations between Obama and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu during their first meeting in Washington in mid-May.

2) Growing Majority of Americans Oppose Israel Building Settlements
WorldPublicOpinion.org, April 29, 2009
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/home_page/604.php

A new WorldPublicOpinion.org poll finds that three-quarters of Americans think that Israel should not build settlements in the Palestinian territories. This is up 23 points from when this question was last asked in 2002.

One third of Americans show more sympathy for Israel than the Palestinians, substantially more than the 12 percent who express more sympathy for the Palestinians.

However the largest number-51 percent-expresses equal levels of sympathy for each side. The percentage expressing equal levels of sympathy is up 10 points from 2002.

Even those respondents who sympathize more with Israel feel that it should not be building settlements in the West Bank by a clear majority (64%), as do those who sympathize equally with Israel and the Palestinians (80%), and those who sympathize more with the Palestinians (96%).

"Americans are showing increasing impatience with Israel for building settlements," comments Steven Kull, director of WorldPublicOpinion.org. "Even the third of Americans who sympathize with Israel more than the Palestinians oppose the settlements."

Opposition to settlements is found among majorities of Republicans (65%), Democrats (83%) and independents (74%). However, more Republicans show more sympathy for Israel (50%) than sympathize with both equally (41%), while Democrats overwhelmingly express equal levels of sympathy (55%) as do independents (64%).

However, when it comes to the question of the settlements, those who followed the issue closely are not significantly different from the general sample: three-quarters of both groups oppose the settlements. Their response to the arguments about the settlements and their position after hearing the arguments are also approximately the same.

Those who both follow the issue closely and believe that the government should make it a high priority-what could be called the "issue public"-constitute 21 percent of the sample. This group is also less likely to say they sympathize with both sides equally (36%) and more likely to express more sympathy for Israel (43%) and for the Palestinians (20%), than the sample as a whole. However, they are just as likely to oppose the settlements as is the sample as a whole.

3) The Progressive Caucus and Obama
Katrina vanden Heuvel, The Nation, 04/29/2009
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut/431234/the_progressive_caucus_and_obama

The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) met with President Obama for one hour in the East Room of the White House yesterday.

CPC Co-Chair, Congressman Raúl Grijalva, said that 50 of the 77 Caucus members attended, and they honed in on two major issues: their commitment to only supporting a healthcare reform bill that includes a public plan option that is "more than a gesture"; and the $83 billion war supplemental.

With regard to the $83 billion war supplemental, Rep. Grijalva said the Caucus expressed its concern that "we’re making the same mistake - everything is going into militarization, not institutional reform, human and capital development, healthcare… those kinds of things." They pointed out to the President that the counterinsurgency strategy calls for 80 percent of the resources to be devoted to non-military/political solutions, and 20 percent to the military. But the supplemental devotes $76 billion for the military and approximately $7 billion for diplomatic efforts and foreign aid.

Obama said that the supplemental reflects the mess he inherited from his predecessor and the consequent short-term security needs. He said the Caucus should look at the FY2010 budget to see the kinds of investments that he supports.

Beyond the supplemental, the Caucus cited four other priorities with regard to Afghanistan and Iraq: no permanent bases; a timetable for exit; the aforementioned 80-20 allocation of resources; and the need to cease using drones due to civilian casualties.

4) Report: Panama FTA Would Undermine U.S. Efforts to Stop Offshore Tax-Haven Abuse and Regulate Risky Financial Conduct
Trade Deal Would Leave Tax Shelters for AIG and Narcotraffickers Intact While Removing Existing U.S. Tools to Combat Tax Evasion and Other Financial Crimes Public Citizen, April 29
http://www.citizen.org/hot_issues/issue.cfm?ID=2229

President Obama’s ability to deliver on his campaign commitments to close tax loopholes that promote offshoring and re-regulate the financial sector would be dealt a sharp blow if the U.S.-Panama Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is passed, according to a Public Citizen report released today.

The new report details how Panama explicitly created an industrial policy designed to create a "comparative advantage" in tax-evasion and money-laundering services for entities such as the bailed-out American International Group (AIG) and Mexican and Colombian narcotraffickers. The report also examines how specific FTA rules would remove key policy tools - such as limitations on transfers from tax-haven countries that are used to combat financial crimes - and would also conflict with U.S. government efforts to combat the global economic crisis by re-regulating finance.

The Panama deal, negotiated by the Bush administration, is modeled on the controversial North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) template. It includes the controversial private "investor-state" enforcement system, which would give new powers to hundreds of thousands of private investors from around the world that are registered and have operations in Panama. This includes the right to challenge U.S. anti-tax haven policies and financial service regulations in foreign tribunals to demand taxpayer-funded compensation.

Among the key findings:
* Some of the largest recipients of U.S. federal procurement contracts and money under the Troubled Asset Relief Program - including Citigroup and AIG - have a combined dozens of subsidiaries in Panama that would be empowered with expansive new rights if the FTA is implemented. These firms have been among the top advocates for the Panama FTA;
* Panama is one of only 13 countries - and the only current or prospective FTA partner - that is listed on all of the major tax-haven watchdog lists that also does not have U.S. tax transparency treaties.
* In the face of recent pressure to reform related to the G-20 Financial Crisis summit process, Panama wrote to the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) defiantly outlining its refusal to adopt key reforms, such as lifting the veil of secrecy on beneficial ownership of bank accounts and automatic exchange of tax information;
* The April 2009 OECD tax-haven watch-list includes Panama among 30 countries that agreed to conform to international tax norms but failed to do so. Indeed, the OECD report notes that Panama made its commitment in 2002 and since has completed not a single agreement to implement its promise. In contrast, other countries on the list have completed as many as eight compliance agreements - which is still not adequate to be taken off this list.
* According to the U.S. Department of Justice and other entities, Panama is also a major financial conduit for Mexican and Colombian narcotraffickers’ money laundering activities;
* According to the U.S. State Department, Panama has more than 350,000 foreign-registered companies, all of which face low to no taxes and regulation. This high rate of foreign incorporation - Panama is reportedly second only to Hong Kong - makes the country a magnet for tax evasion. According to a Panamanian law firm’s advertisement touting Panama’s lax standards: "Even Switzerland cooperates on income tax cases if the return is filed falsely like all income was not declared, things were omitted or so the complaining government says. Belize has tax treaties, as do most of the so-called ‘tax havens.’ There is no better jurisdiction than Panama today!!!!!!!"

5) Pentagon ‘Concerns’ With Pakistan Aid
David S. Cloud, Politico, 4/29/09
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0409/21907.html

After promising last month that U.S. aid to Pakistan would no longer be a "blank check," the Obama administration is attempting to head off efforts in Congress to place tough conditions on the multi-billion dollar assistance package it is seeking for Islamabad.

Senior Pentagon officials told lawmakers yesterday that conditions being proposed by both Democrats and Republican in Congress could "severely constrain" the U.S. strategy for Pakistan, which has assumed greater urgency in recent days as evidence has mounted that the security situation in the country is deteriorating.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, yesterday sent a letter laying out their "strong concerns" about legislation authorizing additional $1.5 billion a year for Pakistan introduced by Rep. Howard Berman, D-Ca., the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

But in a statement replying to Gates and Mullen, Berman played down the conditions in his bill.

"I get the impression that those criticizing my bill haven’t actually read it," he said. "It doesn’t include any ‘rigid’ or ‘inflexible’ conditions. We are simply asking the President to hold the Pakistanis accountable for their commitments to fight the terrorists who threaten their and our national security." The bill does allow the president to waive restrictions on military aid if it is "vital to the national security interest of the United States."

A similar measure is under consideration in the Senate. Lawmakers on the House and Senate Appropriations Committees are also considering proposals for placing conditions on Pakistan aid.

Among other requirements, the Berman bill would prohibit military assistance unless the president certified that Pakistan’s government is taking actions to dismantle nuclear weapons-material supply networks and to combat terrorist groups, according to a summary of the bill.

The bill would also halt all U.S. assistance after next January if the "freely elected government of Pakistan," is overthrown in a coup, which has happened repeatedly over Pakistan’s history.

The Berman measure would also allow Congress to vote on overturning the presidential determination that Pakistan is cooperating adequately.

6) Mexico outbreak traced to ‘manure lagoons’ at pig farm
Chris Ayres, Times of London, April 28, 2009
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article6182789.ece

Mexico City - The first known case of swine flu emerged a fortnight earlier than previously thought in a village where residents have long complained about the smell and flies from a nearby pig farm, it emerged last night.

The Mexican Government said it initially thought that the victim, Edgar Hernandez, 4, was suffering from ordinary influenza but laboratory testing has since shown that he had contracted swine flu. The boy went on to make a full recovery, although it is thought that at least 148 others in Mexico have died from the disease, and the number is expected to rise.

News of the infected boy is expected to create controversy in Mexico because the boy lived in Veracruz state, home to thousands of farmers who claim that their land was stolen from them by the Mexican Government in 1992. The farmers, who call themselves Los 400 Pueblos - The 400 Towns - are famous for their naked marches through the streets of Mexico City.

The boy’s hometown, La Gloria, is also close to a pig farm that raises almost 1 million animals a year. The facility, Granjas Carroll de Mexico, is partly owned by Smithfield Foods, a Virginia-based US company and the world’s largest producer and processor of pork products. Residents of La Gloria have long complained about the clouds of flies that are drawn the so-called "manure lagoons" created by such mega-farms, known in the agriculture business as Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs).

It is now known that there was a widespread outbreak of a powerful respiratory disease in the La Gloria area earlier this month, with some of the town’s residents falling ill in February. Health workers soon intervened, sealing off the town and spraying chemicals to kill the flies that were reportedly swarming through people’s homes.

According reports gathered on the website of James Wilson, a founding member of the Biosurveillance Indication and Warning Analysis Community (BIWAC), about 60 per cent of La Gloria’s 3,000-strong population have sought medical assistance since February.

"Residents claimed that three pediatric cases, all under two years of age, died from the outbreak," wrote Mr Wilson. "However, officials stated that there was no direct link between the pediatric deaths and the outbreak; they said the three fatal cases were isolated and not related to each other."

7) Democrats Urge Torture Probe by Special Counsel
Larry Margasak, Associated Press, Apr 28, 7:05 pm ET
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090428/ap_on_go_co/us_interrogations_probe

Congressional Democrats turned up the pressure on the Obama administration Tuesday to start a criminal investigation by a special counsel into harsh interrogations of terrorism suspects.

It would be a conflict of interest for President Barack Obama’s Justice Department to investigate lawyers from the Bush administration, even though they no longer work for the government, Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee said.

In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, the Democrats wrote, "It is impossible to determine at this stage, and before conclusion of the necessary investigation, whether additional conflicts of interest might exist or arise."

The letter said a special counsel’s investigation would insulate the department from accusations that the investigation was politically inspired.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, also has proposed that independent investigators determine whether Bush administration officials ought to face charges.

Levin recommended that the Justice Department select up to three people outside the department, such as retired federal judges, to recommend any charges or other actions against lawyers and others who developed the policies.

In addition to lawmakers, a coalition of liberal groups delivered petitions to Holder demanding that he name an independent counsel. The groups included the American Civil Liberties Union, MoveOn.org, and the Center or Constitutional Rights.

Israel/Palestine
8) Shortages Stymie Rebuilding Efforts in Gaza
Lourdes Garcia-Navarro, NPR, April 28, 2009
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103466982

In the four months since Israel launched its offensive against Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip, little reconstruction has taken place in the Palestinian territory.

The operation left much of Gaza in ruins, and thousands of Palestinian civilians whose homes were leveled are living in tents or other temporary accommodations.

Every day, Israel allows 80 to 100 truckloads of humanitarian aid into Gaza, but that does not include building supplies. The United Nations is calling on Israel to allow vital reconstruction materials like cement into Gaza. But Israel is resisting the appeal, citing the continuing security threat from militants.

John Ging, director of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency in the Gaza Strip, says that rocket attacks have diminished in recent weeks, yet Israel has not eased its blockade.

"There’s nothing going on in terms of reconstruction because the crossings are still closed. That’s the key to all the misery here," Ging says. "It’s hard to fathom that after all of the outpouring of concern and empathy with the plight of the people here during the January conflict, that months later they are still living in the rubble of their former lives."

"So the rockets have stopped but the siege continues," Ging says. "Where is the dividend for the Palestinians?"

Ecuador
9) US congratulates Ecuador’s Correa on election
AFP, April 28, 2009
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hzl2jUFRe3TmVwgT0IUTTcfyIRWw

The United States on Tuesday congratulated Ecuador’s leftist President Rafael Correa on his election victory and voiced hope for cooperation after a rocky patch between the two countries.

"We salute the people of Ecuador for conducting peaceful and transparent elections and congratulate President Correa on his victory," said State Department spokesman Robert Wood. "The United States will continue to build on our cooperation with Ecuador, consistent with our commitment to supporting Ecuadorian democracy, prosperity and security."

US-Ecuador relations have been rocky since Correa was first elected in 2007. Last year, he forced the US military to leave the Manta military base in southern Ecuador - used for a decade for counternarcotics operations in the region - when its contract expires in November this year.

In February, Ecuador expelled two US diplomats amid continuing rifts over a US-funded counternarcotics program.

Colombia
10) UK ends bilateral military aid to Colombia
- Concerns over human rights prompts decision
- Colombia says move is ’severe blow’ to military
Sibylla Brodzinsky, The Guardian, Wednesday 29 April 2009
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/29/colombia-uk-military-aid

Bogotá - Britain has quietly ended nearly a decade of military aid to Colombia’s armed forces after accusations of gross violations of human rights, including the murder of civilians who were shot and reported as guerrillas killed in combat.

The Colombian government was "extremely surprised" by the decision to cut off the bilateral cooperation programmes, the deputy defence minister, Sergio Jaramillo, told the Guardian.

The British foreign secretary, David Miliband, announced the move in a written statement to the House of Commons last month, stating that the government "shares the concern … that there are officers and soldiers of the Colombian armed forces who have been involved in, or allowed, abuses".

"Our bilateral human rights projects with the Colombian ministry of defence will cease," the statement said.

While the financial value is relatively small, the termination of British military aid has symbolic significance for Colombia. Jaramillo called the decision a "severe blow" to the armed forces from a "great ally".

"No other European country has worked as closely with the army as the United Kingdom," he said.

Colombia’s military had long been accused of colluding with illegal rightwing paramilitary groups. Investigators are looking into 1,296 cases since 2002 of reported executions of civilians by army soldiers who dressed the victims in rebel uniforms and planted weapons on them to present them as legitimate guerrilla casualties.

The UN high commissioner for human rights described the practice as "widespread and systematic". Many of the cases came to light after a public outcry over the fate of 11 men missing from a poor suburb of Bogotá who were then reported as combat deaths thousands of miles away, days after their disappearance. Twenty-seven officers, including three generals were discharged over those killings.

While welcoming the UK’s decision as "a step in the right direction", the London-based group Justice for Colombia said that the "more offensive" elements of British military aid, labelled counter-narcotics assistance, was not affected.

The Foreign Office spokesman acknowledged it would continue to work with "some members of the armed forces" on anti-drug programmes. The UK does not reveal the financial value of that assistance due to "security concerns", he said.

Mexico
11) Mexico Senate OKs bill to legalize drug possession
Reuters, Tue Apr 28, 2009
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN28349522

Mexico City - Mexico’s Senate approved a bill on Tuesday decriminalizing possession of small amounts of narcotics for personal use, in order to free resources to fight violent drug cartels.

The bill, proposed by conservative President Felipe Calderon, would make it legal to carry up to 5 grams of marijuana, 500 milligrams of cocaine and tiny quantities of other drugs such as heroin and methamphetamines.

Mexico’s Congress passed a similar proposal in 2006 but the bill was vetoed by Calderon’s predecessor Vicente Fox, under pressure from the United States, which said it would increase drug abuse, but now is worried by the drug-related violence along its border.

The bill, which needs to be approved by the lower house, also allows Mexican states to convict small-time drug dealers, no longer making it a federal crime to peddle drugs. Drug dealers are rarely convicted in Mexico as federal courts are saturated with bigger cases and local judges cannot interfere.

-
Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org

Just Foreign Policy is a membership organization devoted to reforming US foreign policy so it reflects the values and interests of the majority of Americans.

JFP News, 4/28: Jordan Warns Obama of New Mideast War

Tuesday, April 28th, 2009

Just Foreign Policy News
April 28, 2009

NYT: Americans Support Obama’s Outreach to Iran and Cuba
Despite what some critics in Congress and the media would have you believe, Americans support President Obama’s outreach to Iran and Cuba. The New York Times reports, based on a recent poll: "a majority, 53 percent, said they favored establishing diplomatic relations with Iran, while two-thirds favored Obama’s plans to thaw relations with Cuba." But if you look closer at the questions and responses, the results are even more striking - not only do Americans support’s Obama’s efforts so far - they support things that Obama hasn’t done yet, and hasn’t yet promised to do.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/nyt-americans-support-oba_b_192452.html

Reform US Foreign Policy. Pass the Employee Free Choice Act.
At any given time, we have to promote just foreign policies with the allies available. But over the long term, we’ll never have a foreign policy that truly reflects the values and interests of the majority of Americans until working people in the U.S. - the majority of the population - have more political power.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/27-4

Help us build for a Just Foreign Policy
Your financial contributions to Just Foreign Policy help us create opportunities for Americans to advocate for a just foreign policy.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate.html

Summary:
U.S./Top News
1) Jordan’s King Abdullah urged President Obama to take a more forceful role in the peace process between Israelis and Palestinians, warning of a new Mideast war if there is no significant progress in the next 18 months, CQ reports. Abdullah told NBC the Israeli-Palestinian dispute is the core problem of the region and solving it would help the U.S. in dealing with Iran and combatting the appeal of radical Islamic groups like Al-Qaida.

2) Eliot Engel introduced bi-partisan legislation to create an independent commission to evaluate US policies and programs aimed at reducing illicit drug supply and demand, according to a press release from his office. "America has spent billions upon billions of taxpayer dollars over the years to fight the drug war," Engel said. "Yet, since the early 1980s, the number of American lifetime drug users has steadily risen for marijuana, cocaine and heroin. Clearly, the time has come to reexamine our counternarcotics efforts here at home and throughout the Americas." Connie Mack, Howard Berman, Mary Bono Mack, Robert Wexler, and Dan Burton were original co-sponsors

3) Mexican press reports are linking the swine flu outbreak in Mexico to the hog operations of the U.S.-based Smithfield Corporation, writes Tom Philpott for Grist. has also made the link. According to La Jornada, the Mexican health agency IMSS has acknowledged that the orginal carrier for the flu could be the "clouds of flies" that multiply in the Smithfield subsidiary’s manure lagoons.

4) Claims in an ABC interview with a former CIA agent that Abu Zubaydah started to cooperate after being waterboarded for "probably 30, 35 seconds," widely echoed in the media, have been sharply contradicted by a newly declassified Justice Department memo that said waterboarding had been used on Zubaydah "at least 83 times," the New York Times reports. Some say that the now-discredited information heightened the public perception of waterboarding as an effective interrogation technique. "I think it was sanitized by the way it was described" in press accounts, said a former lawyer for Human Rights Watch. Journalist Mark Danner said the news reports had fed the idea that brutal interrogations could instantly glean information about terrorist plans. "There was a completely mistaken impression put about that this technique was not cruel because it could break detainees so quickly," he said.

5) Accusations of unionbusting around the closing of a textile factory in Honduras have led to a battle between garment manufacturer Russell Athletic and U.S. student activists-and the students appear to be winning, In These Times reports. Students on 31 U.S. campuses have successfully pressured college administrators to cancel contracts with Russell. Russell Athletic is owned by Fruit of the Loom, which in turn is a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway. "There needs to be some adult supervision here, because Russell and Fruit of the Loom clearly do not know how to handle this in a responsible manner," says Scott Nova of the Worker Rights Consortium.

Pakistan
6) A provincial minister said 30,000 people in northwest Pakistan have been displaced by a military offensive to flush out Taliban militants, AFP reports. The military launched the operation following intense US pressure.

Iraq
7) The divergent fates of two former Sunni insurgents highlight the major unknown about the intentions of Iraq’s government: Is it reaching out to former Sunni insurgents in the true spirit of "national reconciliation," or in hopes of splintering the movement, writes Ned Parker in the Los Angeles Times. U.S. officials say they are powerless to stop the Iraqi government from breaking the Sons of Iraq; many fear that former fighters will return to insurgency.

Israel/Palestine
8) Non-violent protests against Israel’s "separation wall" are spreading from Bil’in to other West Bank villages, reports Rory McCarthy for the Guardian. They are also becoming more dangerous. On April 17, Basem Abu Rahmeh was shot with a high-velocity Israeli teargas canister that sliced a hole into his chest, caused massive internal bleeding and quickly killed him. Video footage shot by another demonstrator shows he was unarmed, many metres from the barrier and posing no threat to the soldiers. Last month American Tristan Anderson was hit in the head by an identical high-velocity teargas canister in a protest against the barrier at the nearby village of Na’alin. He was severely injured, losing the sight in his right eye and suffering brain damage. "To shoot peaceful demonstrators is really horrifying to us," said his mother, Nancy. The international court of justice said in a 2004 advisory opinion that the barrier was illegal where it crossed into the West Bank, and even Israel’s supreme court ruled nearly two years ago that the route at Bil’in did not conform to any "security-military reasons" and must be changed. But it has not been moved.

Contents:
U.S./Top News
1) Jordan warns of a new war if Obama does not act quickly
Congressional Quarterly, Monday, 27 April, 2009
http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/2009/04/jordan_warns_of.php

Jordan’s king urged President Barack Obama Sunday during an interview with NBC’s "Meet the Press" to take a more forceful role in the peace process between Israelis and Palestinians, warning of a new Mideast war if there is no significant progress in the next 18 months.

King Abdullah told David Gregory that the Israeli-Palestinian dispute is the core problem of the region and solving it would help the U.S. in dealing with Iran and combatting the appeal of radical Islamic groups like Al-Qaida.

"In the next 18 months, if we don’t move the process forward, and bring people to the negotiation table, there will be another conflict between Israel and another protagonist," he said in the interview

Abdullah: Well, what - what I’m trying to do with this book is to explain the dynamics have changed in the Middle East, and really this is our last best chance.

And believe you me, if we do not solve the problem today of the Israelis and Palestinians, it’s only going to be a matter of time of another conflict. And I had come here to the United States to predict the war in Lebanon several months before. I came to predict that (inaudible) was going to happen, although it took me by surprise by being two months earlier. I thought it was going to happen by the time Obama came into office.

And in the next 18 months, if we don’t move the process forward and bring people to the negotiation table, there will be another conflict between Israel and another protagonist. And how many people have to continue to lose their lives?

And so the message of the book is basically say this is our last chance, because geographically the future of a Palestinian state is under fire. And we’re now arriving at the crossroads that if we do not have a negotiator separate from Israelis and Palestinians, then there may never be a chance.

2) Engel Introduces Bill To Assess U.S. Narcotic Policy
Press Release, Office of Eliot Engel, Tuesday April 28, 2009
http://engel.house.gov/index.cfm?ContentID=1685&ParentID=7&SectionID=216&SectionTree=7,216&lnk=b&ItemID=1675

Washington - Congressman Eliot L. Engel (D-NY) Tuesday introduced bi-partisan legislation to create an independent commission to evaluate US policies and programs aimed at reducing illicit drug supply and demand.

Rep. Engel, Chair of the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, said, "America has spent billions upon billions of taxpayer dollars over the years to fight the drug war in Latin America and the Caribbean. Yet, since the early 1980s, the number of American lifetime drug users has steadily risen for marijuana, cocaine and heroin. Clearly, the time has come to reexamine our counternarcotics efforts here at home and throughout the Americas."

The Western Hemisphere Drug Policy Commission, to be established by the legislation, will submit recommendations on future US drug policy to Congress, the Secretary of State, and the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) a year after its first meeting.

Rep. Engel - who is also a senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health - added, "To tackle our nation’s horrific drug problem once and for all, we cannot simply look to solutions on the supply side. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said it best in Mexico City recently when she noted that ‘our insatiable demand for illegal drugs fuels the drug trade.’ The Western Hemisphere Drug Policy Commission will assess all aspects of the drug war - including prevention and treatment."

While the United States has approximately 5 percent of world population, an estimated 17.2 percent of the world’s users of illegal drugs were from the United States. 100 percent of the United States cocaine supply, and 90 percent of the United States heroin supply originates in South America. In addition, the countries of Central America, the Caribbean and Mexico are key transit countries for drugs entering the US.

Representatives Connie Mack (R-FL), Howard Berman (D-CA), Mary Bono Mack (R-CA), Robert Wexler (D-FL), Dan Burton (R-IN) and Pedro Pierluisi (D-PR) joined Congressman Engel as original co-sponsors of the Western Hemisphere Drug Policy Commission Act of 2009.

3) Swine-flu outbreak could be linked to Smithfield factory farms
Tom Philpott, Grist, 25 Apr 2009
http://www.grist.org/article/2009-04-25-swine-flu-smithfield/

The outbreak of a new flu strain-a nasty mash-up of swine, avian, and human viruses-has infected 1,000 people in Mexico and the U.S., killing 68. The World Health Organization warned Saturday that the outbreak could reach global pandemic levels.

Is Smithfield Foods, the world’s largest pork packer and hog producer, linked to the outbreak? Smithfield operates massive hog-raising operations Perote, Mexico, in the state of Vera Cruz, where the outbreak originated. The operations, grouped under a Smithfield subsidiary called Granjas Carroll, raise 950,000 hogs per year, according to the company Web site.

On Friday, the U.S. disease-tracking blog Biosurveillance published a timeline of the outbreak containing this nugget, dated April 6.

"Residents [of Perote] believed the outbreak had been caused by contamination from pig breeding farms located in the area. They believed that the farms, operated by Granjas Carroll, polluted the atmosphere and local water bodies, which in turn led to the disease outbreak. According to residents, the company denied responsibility for the outbreak and attributed the cases to "flu." However, a municipal health official stated that preliminary investigations indicated that the disease vector was a type of fly that reproduces in pig waste and that the outbreak was linked to the pig farms. It was unclear whether health officials had identified a suspected pathogen responsible for this outbreak."

From what I can tell, the possible link to Smithfield has not been reported in the U.S. press. Searches of Google News and the websites of the New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal all came up empty. The link is being made in the Mexican media, however. "Granjas Carroll, causa de epidemia en La Gloria," declared a headline in the Vera Cruz-based paper La Marcha. No need to translate that, except to point out that La Gloria is the village where the outbreak seems to have started.

The Mexico City daily La Jornada has also made the link. According to the newspaper, the Mexican health agency IMSS has acknowledged that the orginal carrier for the flu could be the "clouds of flies" that multiply in the Smithfield subsidiary’s manure lagoons.

4) How ‘07 ABC Interview Tilted A Torture Debate
Brian Stelter, New York Times, April 28, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/28/business/media/28abc.html

In late 2007, there was the first crack of daylight into the government’s use of waterboarding during interrogations of Al Qaeda detainees. On Dec. 10, John Kiriakou, a former C.I.A. officer who had participated in the capture of the suspected terrorist Abu Zubaydah in Pakistan in 2002, appeared on ABC News to say that while he considered waterboarding a form of torture, the technique worked and yielded results very quickly.

Zubaydah started to cooperate after being waterboarded for "probably 30, 35 seconds," Kiriakou told the ABC reporter Brian Ross. "From that day on he answered every question."

His claims - unverified at the time, but repeated by dozens of broadcasts, blogs and newspapers - have been sharply contradicted by a newly declassified Justice Department memo that said waterboarding had been used on Zubaydah "at least 83 times."

Some critics say that the now-discredited information shared by Kiriakou and other sources heightened the public perception of waterboarding as an effective interrogation technique. "I think it was sanitized by the way it was described" in press accounts, said John Sifton, a former lawyer for Human Rights Watch, an advocacy group.

During the heated debate in 2007 over the use of waterboarding and other techniques, Kiriakou’s comments quickly ricocheted around the media. But lost in much of the coverage was the fact that Kiriakou had no firsthand knowledge of the waterboarding: He was not actually in the secret prison in Thailand where Zubaydah had been interrogated but in the C.I.A. headquarters in Northern Virginia. He learned about it only by reading accounts from the field.

On "World News," ABC included only a caveat that Kiriakou himself "never carried out any of the waterboarding." Still, he told ABC that the actions had "disrupted a number of attacks, maybe dozens of attacks." A video of the interview was no longer on ABC’s website.

"It works, is the bottom line," Rush Limbaugh exclaimed on his radio show the next day. "Thirty to 35 seconds, and it works."

Kiriakou subsequently granted interviews to The Washington Post, The New York Times, National Public Radio, CBS, CNN, MSNBC and other media organizations. A CNN anchor called him "the man of the hour."

Eight months after the interview, Kiriakou was hired as a paid consultant for ABC News. He resigned last month and now works for the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.

In the days after Kiriakou’s media blitz, his claims were repeated by an array of other outlets. For instance, the Fox News anchor Chris Wallace cited the 35 seconds claim to ask a congressman whether the interrogation program was "really so bad."

Months later the claims continued to be amplified; the National Review editor Jonah Goldberg used Kiriakou’s assertions in a column last year to argue that the waterboarding was "right and certainly defensible."

Mark Danner, a journalist who has written extensively about the covert program for The New York Review of Books, said the news reports had fed the idea that brutal interrogations could instantly glean information about terrorist plans.

"There was a completely mistaken impression put about that this technique was not cruel because it could break detainees so quickly," he said.

But the recent Justice Department memo has led some commentators to revisit their earlier impressions about the technique.

"I’ve always been on the fence about whether waterboarding constituted torture," Goldberg of the National Review wrote last week, but if the figures are true, "then I think the threshold has been met."

5) Students Won’t Sweat It
Under fire for alleged union-busting, Russell Athletic is losing university contracts around the country.
Micah Williams, In These Times, April 20, 2009
http://inthesetimes.com/article/4367/pstudents_wont_sweat_it_p/

The closing of a textile factory in Honduras has led to a battle between garment manufacturer Russell Athletic and U.S. student activists-and the students appear to be winning.

In October 2008, the company closed its Jerzees de Honduras factory in the city of Choloma-its only unionized plant in the country. In the wake of the decision, thousands of students on 31 U.S. campuses have successfully pressured college administrators to cancel contracts with Russell through petitions, meetings and protests.

Reports from the Worker Rights Consortium (WRC), an international labor monitor, ruled that the closing was the culmination of Russell’s long-time efforts to break the factory’s union, of which 750 of 1,800 employees were members.

In November 2008, the WRC issued a report alleging a two-year campaign by management to eliminate the union, which it labeled the "scorched earth option." It also said Russell’s alleged union-busting activities were "among the most brazen and systematic the WRC has ever encountered."

In October, workers at Jerzees de Honduras declared an impasse during contract negotiations, which, under Honduran labor law, requires a government mediator and is the first step toward a legal strike. Five days later, the company announced the factory’s closure.

Russell insists the move was purely a business decision, noting their seven other factory closures in Honduras last year. But Scott Nova, executive director of the WRC, cites a history of anti-union firings and 70 documented threats from management-some by top corporate officials-that union activity would lead to the plant’s shuttering.

"The fact that an economic motive may also have been present does not in any way exonerate Russell," says Nova. "This is a company that, by its own admission, has engaged in systematic abuse of workers’ associational rights. Given that admitted history of violation, it’s very difficult to take seriously their present denials."

In response to the closure, activists with United Students Against Sweatshops, a national network of student groups, have toured the country with the workers’ union, Sitrajerzeesh, pressuring administrators to cut or not renew contracts until Jerzees de Honduras is reopened. The Universities of Michigan, Minnesota, Penn State, Purdue and Wisconsin have already cut contracts.

Rod Palmquist, USAS international campaigns coordinator for, estimates the cuts have cost Russell millions of dollars.

Russell Athletic is owned by Fruit of the Loom, which in turn is a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, the massive conglomerate owned by billionaire investor Warren Buffet. The company has not stepped in, but the WRC’s Nova thinks it should.

"There needs to be some adult supervision here, because Russell and Fruit of the Loom clearly do not know how to handle this in a responsible manner," says Nova. "Not even morally responsible, but responsible for their own brand, because what they’re doing is ultimately damaging to their own brand."

Meanwhile, universities continue to drop Russell. Palmquist expects the cuts won’t end until the factory is reopened. "Russell is such a serial abuser of workers’ rights that it’s not even controversial for schools all around the country to take serious action against them," he says. "And more schools around the country are going to follow suit until they reopen Jerzees de Honduras."

Pakistan
6) 30,000 Flee Army Raid on NW Pakistan: Local Official
AFP, April 28, 2009, 9:50 pm
http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/5529636

Peshawar - Around 30,000 people in northwest Pakistan have been displaced by a military offensive to flush out Taliban militants, a provincial minister said Tuesday.

"Up to 30,000 people have left Maidan in Lower Dir district over the past few days," Mian Iftikhar Hussain, information minister in the government of North West Frontier Province, told a news conference. "We are making arrangements for them in Peshawar , Nowshera and Timargarah districts."

Residents said thousands of terrified people, mostly women and children, left the area with their belongings after Pakistan troops and helicopter gunships launched the operation over the weekend. One local charity said it had registered 2,241 displaced families so far.

The Taliban suspended peace talks with the government Monday after the military launched Operation Black Thunder following intense US pressure to stop the extremists’ advance.

"My uncle was working in the fields when he was wounded in helicopter shelling," Hayat Khan 36, one of those who fled the fighting, told AFP. "I came to Timargarah with my wife, children and a sister whose husband lives in Dubai. I cannot see them dying there," Khan said, adding that his uncle had been admitted to a hospital in Timargarah.

"I saw helicopters targeting hills in Maidan yesterday," said 40-year old Omar Zeb, who arrived in Timargarah with 16 other relatives including brother, nephews and nieces. "There was intense artillery shelling last night, my children were scared, none of us could sleep the whole night. We left at dawn, fearing the fighting would escalate."

Information minister Hussain said the government remained "determined to fully implement the deal but some outsiders who do not want peace have infiltrated in Buner and Dir districts to sabotage the accord." He invited Soofi Mohammad, leader of a sharia movement in the area, to resume talks to avoid any delay in the implementation of the deal.

Taliban spokesman Amir Izzat Khan said the operation in Lower Dir could endanger the peace deal. "There can be a reaction to the government action," he told AFP.

However, President Asif Ali Zardari said Monday the peace deal with the Taliban remained valid until the North West Frontier Province government told him otherwise.

Iraq
7) The Fate Of 2 Iraqis Poses A Key Question
A politician and a fighter were both part of the Sons of Iraq, a U.S.-backed Sunni force that helped end the civil war. Now one is hunted and the other is trying to find a place in the government.
Ned Parker, Los Angeles Times, April 27, 2009
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iraq-awakening28-2009apr28,0,115151.story

Alrifoosh, Iraq - They were unlikely comrades in arms: the security guard and the stockbroker who stepped out of the shadows of the insurgency to fight Al Qaeda in Iraq.

Abu Maarouf, wiry and good with a gun, headed a hit squad and waged a tribal rebellion against insurgents who had turned the revolt against the Americans into a brutal, thuggish affair. Abu Azzam, heavyset and fond of tailored suits, led secret talks with the Americans that helped forge an alliance with the U.S. military in Abu Ghraib, the no man’s land between Baghdad and Fallouja.

The story of Abu Maarouf and Abu Azzam offers a rare window into the birth and slow death of the Sons of Iraq, the U.S.-backed corps of Sunni fighters who helped end the country’s civil war.

Today, Abu Maarouf is on the run, hunted by the Iraqi army and the group Al Qaeda in Iraq. Afraid of midnight raids and ambushes, he sleeps some nights in irrigation ditches. Many say it’s a miracle he’s still alive.

His old cohort Abu Azzam spends his days inside the blast walls of the hermetic Green Zone in meetings with officials from Prime Minister Nouri Maliki’s office.

The divergent fates of these two former Sunni insurgents highlight the major unknown about the intentions of Iraq’s Shiite-led government: Is it reaching out to former Sunni insurgents such as Abu Azzam in the true spirit of "national reconciliation," or in hopes of splintering the movement?

And will the government’s campaign against men such as Abu Maarouf succeed in snuffing out potential rivals? Or is it planting seeds for a long-term Sunni revolt?

The crackdown also points to a significant change in the U.S. forces’ onetime policy of nurturing and protecting the Sons of Iraq. As the Iraqi government has arrested some of the movement’s leaders, forced others into exile and failed to deliver jobs for rank-and-file fighters, the Americans have regularly deferred to Baghdad’s wishes as they hand over responsibility for the country’s security.

"I worked with the American forces very hard, but in the end they pushed me aside. That’s what they’ve done," Abu Maarouf said on a recent day in his home village of Alrifoosh, not far from where hooded gunmen once patrolled. He worried that fighters, angry over the government’s actions, might now be open to joining Al Qaeda in Iraq.

The Americans, who once wrote the paychecks for 100,000 fighters with the militias, say their hands are tied. "We are just walking on eggshells. We are afraid we are going to violate the security agreement," a U.S. military officer said on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject.

Publicly, military spokesmen point to an Iraqi government commitment to find jobs for the fighters, but breeze over the recent pattern of arrests and the fact that there is only one year of funding to absorb the Sons of Iraq into state jobs, with no guarantees those jobs will exist after 2009.

"They [the government] are breaking the back of these organizations," the U.S. officer said. "They are going after the key leaders, and once they eliminate the key leaders, the members will drift away. The problem is some of them will drift back to their old groups."

As his revolt gained credibility, Abu Maarouf’s old comrade Abu Azzam, whom he had known from huddles with other insurgent groups, introduced him to the Americans. In turn, Abu Maarouf’s forces helped Abu Azzam seize control of his village from militants and establish his own paramilitary force.

U.S. military officers who remember him from that time describe him in epic terms. "He sacrificed everything to fight Qaeda. He almost turned his back on his family. Qaeda would rape and kill; a guy like Abu Maarouf cleaned the area up," a second officer said, also on condition of anonymity. "He set the conditions for the U.S. military expansion into the area, more than anything you could imagine."

Abu Maarouf wonders where his old friends from the U.S. Army are now. Some of them are back in Iraq, and they haven’t contacted him. A month ago, the Iraqi army raided his house and detained his son and his brother. His brother has since been released, and Abu Maarouf says the Americans have told him they cannot guarantee he won’t be arrested too.

On Wednesday, he officially resigned from the Sons of Iraq. He has ordered his men to stay on the job, but vows he will not return unless his son is freed and the government guarantees him immunity from the courts.

In Abu Azzam’s view, the Sunni revolt had been misguided. He saw working with the Americans as the way to counteract Iranian influence in the country. He says some now consider him a pariah within his own community.

After everything that has happened, he chuckles that some Sunnis think he went too far. Still, he has won a seat on the Baghdad provincial council and plans to run in national elections this fall. He thinks the Americans have put a halt to the latest string of arrests against the Sons of Iraq, but is unsure how events will play out. He sees a divided Shiite government, with people around Maliki who both support and oppose reaching out to men like him. Abu Azzam predicts that one day soon Abu Maarouf will be arrested. He complains that his old friend has never given up his ties to the insurgency and this has doomed him.

In their own way, each is prepared for the worst. Abu Maarouf says he can defend himself if the government tries to arrest him, and even Abu Azzam speaks of the possibility of war. "If we don’t have our place [in the government] then we have another place," he said on a recent day of meetings with the Americans and the prime minister’s office. "We will have a role in any case whether in peace or war. We wish to have our role in peace."

Israel/Palestine
8) Non-Violent Protests Against West Bank Barrier Turn Increasingly Dangerous
Palestinian demonstrations intended to be peaceful met with Israeli teargas, stun grenades and sometimes live ammunition
Rory McCarthy, Guardian, Monday 27 April 2009
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/apr/27/israel-security-barrier-protests

It began calmly enough with a march down the high street after midday prayers at the mosque. Palestinian villagers were surrounded by dozens of foreigners singing and waving flags. They turned and headed out to the olive-tree fields and up towards the broad path of Israel’s West Bank barrier. There, behind a concrete hilltop bunker, the Israeli soldiers looked down on them.

The crowd approached the barrier, still singing. One man flew a paper kite shaped as a plane. "This land is a closed military zone," an Israeli soldier shouted in flawless Arabic over a loudspeaker. "You are not allowed near the wall." Then the soldiers fired a barrage of teargas.

It has been like this every Friday in the village of Bil’in for more than four years - the most persistent popular demonstration against Israel’s vast steel and concrete barrier. It is a protest founded on non-violence that is spreading to other West Bank villages. But it has become increasingly dangerous.

On April 17, on the hillside at Bil’in, a Palestinian named Basem Abu Rahmeh, 31, was shot with a high-velocity Israeli teargas canister that sliced a hole into his chest, caused massive internal bleeding and quickly killed him. Video footage shot by another demonstrator shows he was unarmed, many metres from the barrier and posing no threat to the soldiers.

The Israeli military said it faced a "violent and illegal riot" and is investigating. On Friday the demonstrators at Bil’in wore Rameh’s image on T-shirts and carried it on posters.

Last month another demonstrator, an American named Tristan Anderson, 38, was hit in the head by an identical high-velocity teargas canister in a protest against the barrier at the nearby village of Na’alin. He was severely injured, losing the sight in his right eye and suffering brain damage. "To shoot peaceful demonstrators is really horrifying to us," said his mother, Nancy.

There have long been Palestinian advocates of non-violence, but they were drowned out by the militancy of the second intifada, the uprising that began in late 2000 and erupted into waves of appalling suicide bombings.

Eyad Burnat, 36, has spent long hours in discussions with the young men of Bil’in, a small village of fewer than 2,000, convincing them of the merits of "civil grassroots resistance".

"Of course it gets more difficult when someone is killed," said Burnat, who heads the demonstration. "But we’ve faced these problems in the past. We’ve had more than 60 people arrested and still they go back to non-violence. We’ve made a strategic decision."

Some, like the moderate Palestinian MP Mustafa Barghouti, hope this might be the start of a broader movement throughout Palestinian society. "It is a spark that is spreading," he said in Bil’in. "It gives an alternative to the useless negotiations and to those who say only violence can help."

The barrier at Bil’in cuts off the village from more than half its agricultural land and has allowed the continuing expansion of Jewish settlements, including the vast, ultra-Orthodox settlement of Modiin Illit, even though all settlements on occupied land are illegal under international law.

The international court of justice said in a 2004 advisory opinion that the barrier was illegal where it crossed into the West Bank, and even Israel’s supreme court ruled nearly two years ago that the route at Bil’in did not conform to any "security-military reasons" and must be changed. But it has not been moved.

Often the most sensitive issue for the villagers has not been whether to take up arms, but whether to accept in their midst so many foreigners, and in particular so many Israeli demonstrators. Ahmad al-Khatib said it was the "most disputed question" and that many feared the Israelis were spying on them until they saw they, too, were being injured and arrested.

-
Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org

Just Foreign Policy is a membership organization devoted to reforming US foreign policy so it reflects the values and interests of the majority of Americans.

JFP News, 4/27: Pass EFCA to reform foreign policy

Monday, April 27th, 2009

Just Foreign Policy News
April 27, 2009

Reform US Foreign Policy. Pass the Employee Free Choice Act.
At any given time, we have to promote just foreign policies with the allies available. But over the long term, we’ll never have a foreign policy that truly reflects the values and interests of the majority of Americans until working people in the U.S. - the majority of the population - have more political power. That’s why Americans who want to reform our foreign policy have a stake in the passage of the Employee Free Choice Act.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/04/27-4

Help us build for a Just Foreign Policy
Your financial contributions to Just Foreign Policy help us create opportunities for Americans to advocate for a just foreign policy.
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/donate.html

Summary:
U.S./Top News

1) Obama’s $83.4 billion war-spending bill is headed for an unexpectedly tough time on Capitol Hill, where rank-and-file Democrats want to include performance benchmarks for the Afghanistan mission, the Washington Times reports.

2) The Obama administration has opened the door a crack to engagement with Hamas, the Los Angeles Times reports. The administration has asked Congress for minor changes in U.S. law that would permit aid to continue flowing to Palestinians in the event Hamas-backed officials become part of a unified Palestinian government. The move has alarmed "congressional supporters of Israel," who are watching for signs the new White House might be more sympathetic to Palestinians than was the Bush administration, the LAT says. Clinton defended the administration’s position last week before Congress, noting that the US supports and funds the Lebanese government, even though it includes members of Hezbollah, another militant group on the U.S. terrorist list.

3) Why is the US fighting tribal insurgents in the remote Korengal Valley in Afghanistan? asks David Ignatius in the Washington Post. A New York Times story story described the enemy as "Taliban," but said the locals are angry "in part because they are loggers and the Afghan government banned almost all timber cutting, putting local men out of work." There’s apparently no sign of al-Qaeda in the valley. Former Afghan finance minister and current presidential candidate Ashraf Ghani says the definition of the average Taliban supporter is "unemployed youth."

4) The Obama administration is quietly pushing forward with efforts to reopen channels of communication with Cuba, the New York Times reports. Officials said informal meetings were being planned between the State Department and Cuban diplomats in the US to determine whether the governments could open formal talks on a variety of issues, including migration, drug trafficking and other regional security matters. Their comments indicated a departure from the White House’s previous position it would not make further moves toward engagement until the Cuban government reciprocated Obama’s lifting of restrictions on Cuban-Americans.

Iran
5) President Ahmedinijad affirmed that Iran would support an agreement between the Palestinians and Israel, the Telegraph reports.

6) Writing in the New York Times, Roger Cohen says that Secretary of State Clinton was "shocked" by the humiliation of Palestinians in the West Bank. He praises her pressure on the Netanyahu government, and says he agrees that US-Iran rapprochement and Israel-Palestinian peace are linked, while objecting that more sanctions on Iran won’t work: Iran won’t come to the table if it sees Obama’s extended hand as just a deceptive prelude to "crippling" measures.

Iraq
7) Prime Minister Maliki denounced a U.S. raid in which 2 Iraqis were killed, calling it a violation of the security agreement and demanding that U.S. soldiers who carried out the operation be prosecuted, the Washington Post reports. A relative of the victims said that U.S. military officials apologized and said the raid was a mistake.

8) Maliki is resisting U.S. appeals to reconcile with Iraqi Baathists, the New York Times reports. 15 months after Maliki pushed through Parliament a law to ease restrictions on the return of Baath Party members to public life, the law has yet to be put into effect. [Passage of the law was touted by the Bush Administration as a huge success - JFP.]

Pakistan
9) The "cosmic" level of concern being expressed about the security situation in Pakistan makes no sense, writes Juan Cole in Informed Comment. The NYT’s breathless observation that there are Taliban a hundred miles from Islamabad doesn’t actually tell us very much, since Islamabad is geographically close to the Pushtun regions without that implying that Pushtuns could dominate it. It is like saying that Lynchburg, Va., is close to Washington DC and thereby implying that Jerry Falwell’s movement is about to take over the latter. The Pakistani Taliban amount to a few thousand fighters who lack tanks, armored vehicles, and an air force. The Pakistani military is the world’s sixth largest, with 550,000 active duty troops and is well equipped and well-trained.

Mexico
10) President Calderon’s proposal to let Mexico declare temporary states of emergency and expand the army’s power in a fight against drug gangs drew immediate fire from human rights activists, AP reports. Human rights groups say the bill may be a sign that Calderon is reversing a promise to get the army off the streets as soon as possible.

Ecuador
11) President Correa easily won re-election Sunday with 52 percent of the vote, a 24 percentage point lead over his nearest rival, Reuters reports. Exit polls showed Correa’s party was close to securing an absolute majority in the assembly.

Contents:
U.S./Top News
1) Hill battle on war spending looms
S.A. Miller, Washington Times, Sunday, April 26, 2009
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/26/battle-expected-on-war-spending/

President Obama’s $83.4 billion war-spending bill is headed for an unexpectedly tough time on Capitol Hill, where Republicans are scrutinizing the funding priorities and rank-and-file Democrats want to include performance benchmarks for the Afghanistan mission.

Despite bipartisan support for Obama’s war policy in Iraq and Afghanistan, Republicans are taking a stand against the more than $81 million requested to shut down the prison camp at U.S. Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Another debate is brewing over performance benchmarks some Democrats want attached to the spending bill, giving a nod to the party’s antiwar base. Democrats successfully fought to include benchmarks for success in Iraq to former President George W. Bush’s war funding.

"The United States needs to take a new direction in both Iraq and Afghanistan, and that direction is out," said Rep. Dennis J. Kucinich, Ohio Democrat. "When will the administration recognize that [Afghanistan] has been disintegrating for some time, and that it puts us at risk of an expanded war?"

On the other side of the Capitol, Sen. Ben Nelson, Nebraska Democrat, is pressing for criteria to gauge U.S. success in Afghanistan. "Senator Nelson has been working with the administration and will continue to work with the administration to develop progress measures for Afghanistan," Nelson spokesman Clay Westrope said. "Once the administration develops these measures, Senator Nelson will review them to see if anything further is required to fully assess progress in Afghanistan."

Obama, who is expected to present the administration’s own performance measures this week, does not want benchmarks written by Congress tacked onto the war funds.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, has ruled out performance benchmarks for Afghanistan. "I don’t know that we’ll have benchmarks. I think the president has presented a policy that this funding would support," she told reporters on Capitol Hill. "It is self-evident that the money we put into Afghanistan should produce some results over a period of time."

The request would double spending on the Iraq and Afghanistan wars so far this year and pay for military operations into the fall. If approved, it would boost 2009 war spending to about $150 billion, which is about $40 billion less than what the U.S. spent on the wars in 2008 and about $20 billion less than in 2007.

Obama’s current request would push the cost of the wars to nearly $1 trillion since the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan after the Sept. 11 attacks, according to the Congressional Research Service.

2) Obama move alarms Israel supporters
The administration seeks changes that would permit aid to Palestinians even if officials backed by Hamas, which has been designated a terrorist group, become part of a unified Palestinian government.
Paul Richter, Los Angeles Times, April 27, 2009
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-obama-hamas27-2009apr27,0,4563512.story

The Obama administration, already on treacherous political ground because of its outreach to traditional adversaries such as Iran and Cuba, has opened the door a crack to engagement with the militant group Hamas.

The Palestinian group is designated by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization and under law may not receive federal aid.

But the administration has asked Congress for minor changes in U.S. law that would permit aid to continue flowing to Palestinians in the event Hamas-backed officials become part of a unified Palestinian government.

The aid measures may never come into play. Power-sharing negotiations between Hamas and its rival, the U.S.-backed Fatah faction, appear deadlocked. The two have been bitterly divided since 2007, when Hamas drove Fatah out of the Gaza Strip. Fatah controls only the West Bank.

Nevertheless, the move has alarmed congressional supporters of Israel, who are watching for signs that the new Democratic team at the White House might be more sympathetic to Palestinians than was the Bush administration.

The administration’s proposal is akin to agreeing to support a government that "only has a few Nazis in it," Rep. Mark Steven Kirk (R-Ill.) told Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton at a House hearing last week.

The move underscores the quandary faced by the Obama administration in its efforts to broker Mideast peace. President Obama has repeatedly called for a separate Palestinian state. But negotiating a peace agreement, or even distributing aid, will be difficult without dealing with Hamas, which won Palestinian elections in 2006.

The administration requested the changes this month as part of an $83.4-billion emergency spending bill that also contains funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The bill also would provide $840 million for the Palestinian Authority and for rebuilding in Gaza after the 22-day Israeli military assault this year. The administration still is wrestling with how to deliver the aid to Gaza because of the tough federal restrictions on dealing with Hamas.

U.S. officials insist that the new proposal doesn’t amount to recognizing or aiding Hamas. Under law, any U.S. aid would require that the Palestinian government meet three long-standing criteria: recognizing Israel, renouncing violence and agreeing to follow past Israeli-Palestinian agreements.

Hamas as an organization doesn’t meet those criteria. However, if the rival Palestinian factions manage to reach a power-sharing deal, the Obama administration wants to be able to provide aid as long as the Hamas-backed members of the government - if not Hamas itself - meet the three criteria.

This position marks a shift from the Bush administration, which disapproved of power sharing and welcomed the collapse of a unity government in 2007 after only a few months.

Clinton defended the administration’s position last week before Congress. She said that the United States supports and funds the Lebanese government, even though it includes members of Hezbollah, another militant group on the U.S. terrorist list.

She contended that the United States should try to gradually change the attitudes of Hamas members, as it did with militants in Northern Ireland, where it helped broker a deal that included the Irish Republican Army, even though not all of its members agreed. "We don’t want to . . . bind our hands in the event that such an agreement is reached, and the government that they are part of agrees to our principles," she said.

Nathan Brown, a specialist in Palestinian politics at George Washington University, said he considered it significant that the administration was willing to approach Congress with the proposal, knowing lawmakers were likely to be opposed. "That’s gutsy," he said.

Ziad Asali, president of the American Task Force on Palestine, a Washington group that advocates Palestinian statehood, saw the proposal as another of Obama’s gestures to adversaries. "This is saying, ‘I’m reasonable. I’m trying to make a start. Don’t say I haven’t tried,’ " Asali said.

3) Tough Choices At Korengal Outpost
David Ignatius, Washington Post, Sunday, April 26, 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/24/AR2009042402899.html

Recently the New York Times carried vivid war reporting from Afghanistan. C.J. Chivers described the "bloody standoff" in the Korengal Valley between American troops and die-hard tribal warriors. Photographer Tyler Hicks snapped an unforgettable front-page picture of a U.S. soldier in a mad dash to escape a riverside ambush.

But I found myself wondering: Why is the United States fighting insurgents in the remote Korengal Valley in the first place? The story described the enemy as "Taliban," but it said the locals are angry "in part because they are loggers and the Afghan government banned almost all timber cutting, putting local men out of work." There’s apparently no sign of al-Qaeda in the valley, where people are fiercely independent and speak their own exotic language.

The senior officials who drafted Obama’s strategy agree that it has this inherent tension, but they say it’s inescapable. They believe that a successful counterinsurgency fight has both a soft, road-building side and a kinetic, kill-the-enemy side. The challenge, the officials say, is combining the two approaches to splinter the insurgency. If the strategy works, says one of the people who drafted it, the United States will dismember the "syndicate" of insurgent groups by the end of the summer fighting season this year or next.

To get an Afghan view, I spoke last week with Ashraf Ghani, who was finance minister from 2002 to 2004 in the first post-Taliban government and who is now running for president. He’s a supremely articulate man who earned a doctorate in anthropology from Columbia University and worked at the World Bank. He’s probably a long shot for the presidential palace in Kabul, but he has a clear analysis of what’s needed - from Americans and Afghans, both - to put this war on a better track.

"Choices have to be made in terms of how the U.S. strategy is implemented - counterinsurgency tactics, or kinetic. Right now, they’re attempting to do both," says Ghani. He favors the former and cautions that "months of counterinsurgency work can be undone by one kinetic action."

Ghani is running on several issues that need to be addressed, no matter who wins. He wants greater Afghan self-reliance, reform of the country’s corrupt and feeble government, and a jobs program. The definition of the average Taliban supporter, he says, is "unemployed youth."

I was encouraged by Ghani’s comments about reconciliation with some elements of the Taliban alliance. Take Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, who’s part of the insurgent syndicate. Ghani has read four books written by Hekmatyar and says that the bearded warlord has a "very modernist vision." He also cites a new book by Mullah Abdul Salam Zaeef, a Taliban leader who was held at Guantanamo from 2002 to 2005. Ghani says the mullah mirrors the evolution of the Taliban away from jihadism and toward nationalism and development.

4) U.S. Quietly Plans Informal Talks With Cuba
Ginger Thompson, New York Times, April 27, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/world/americas/27cuba.html

Seizing the momentum from recent meetings with Latin American leaders, the Obama administration is quietly pushing forward with efforts to reopen channels of communication with Cuba, according to White House and State Department officials.

The officials said informal meetings were being planned between the State Department and Cuban diplomats in the United States to determine whether the two governments could open formal talks on a variety of issues, including migration, drug trafficking and other regional security matters.

And the administration is also looking for ways to open channels for more cultural and academic exchanges between Cuba and the United States, the officials said.

The next steps, said a senior administration official, would be meant to "test the waters," to see whether the United States and Cuba could develop a "serious, civil, open relationship."

The details and scope of the administration’s outreach to Cuba are still being worked out, they said. But their comments indicated a departure from the White House’s previous position that it would not make further moves toward engagement until the Castro government reciprocated President Obama’s lifting of restrictions on Cuban-Americans who wished to travel to Cuba or send money to relatives on the island.

Obama has faced mounting pressure from Latin America and from his supporters in this country to do more to reverse the United States’ 47-year-old trade embargo against the Castro dictatorship. Cuba has become the litmus test by which many Latin American nations measure the United States’ commitment to improving relations with the region.

Polls suggest that there is increasing support among Cuban-Americans for ending the United States’ policy of isolation toward Cuba. And proposals have been made in both houses of Congress that would lift restrictions on travel to Cuba for all Americans.

Iran
5) Iran’s President ‘Would Support Two-State Solution’ For Israel
Alex Spillius, Telegraph (UK), 26 Apr 2009
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/5225705/Irans-President-would-support-two-state-solution-for-Israel.html

Asked if he would support an agreement between the Palestinians and Tehran’s arch enemy, he said: "Whatever decision they take is fine with us. We are not going to determine anything. Whatever decision they take, we will support that."

"We think that is the right of the Palestinian people, however we fully expect other states to do so as well."

6) Clinton’s Mideast Pirouette
Roger Cohen, New York Times, April 27, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/opinion/27iht-edcohen.html?ref=opinion

The sparring between the United States and Israel has begun, and that’s a good thing. Israel’s interests are not served by an uncritical American administration. The Jewish state emerged less secure and less loved from Washington’s post-9/11 Israel-can-do-no-wrong policy.

The criticism of the center-right government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has come from an unlikely source: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. She’s transitioned with aplomb from the calculation of her interests that she made as a senator from New York to a cool assessment of U.S. interests. These do not always coincide with Israel’s.

I hear that Clinton was shocked by what she saw on her visit last month to the West Bank.

The whole desolate West Bank scene is punctuated with garrison-like settlements on hilltops. If you’re looking for a primer on colonialism, this is not a bad place to start. Most Israelis never see this, unless they’re in the army. Clinton witnessed it. She was, I understand, troubled by the humiliation around her.

Now, she has warned Netanyahu to get off "the sidelines" with respect to Palestinian peace efforts. Remember that the Israeli prime minister and his right-wing Likud party have still not accepted even the theory of a two-state solution.

In House testimony last week, Clinton said: "For Israel to get the kind of strong support it is looking for vis-à-vis Iran, it can’t stay on the sidelines with respect to the Palestinians and the peace efforts. They go hand in hand." That was a direct rebuke to comments from Netanyahu aides who told the Washington Post Israel would not move on peace talks until it sees the United States check Iran’s nuclear program and rising regional influence.

Although I don’t agree with the forms of linkage being made by Netanyahu and Clinton between Iran and an Israeli-Palestinian peace - the issue is not how to threaten Iran but how to bring it inside the tent - I agree with both of them that a link exists. At Madrid, at Oslo and at Annapolis, over a 16-year span, attempts were made to advance peace while excluding Iran. That doesn’t work; it won’t work now.

The trick is to usher Israel-Palestine peace efforts and the quest for a U.S.-Iran rapprochement along in parallel. That’s why it’s so important that Clinton told Netanyahu that he can’t slip away from working for peace - and that means stopping settlements now - by taking an Iran detour.

Clinton also indicated an important shift on Hamas, which the State Department calls a terrorist group. While stressing that no funds would flow to Hamas "or any entity controlled by it," she argued for keeping American options open on a possible Palestinian unity government between the moderate Fatah and Hamas.

So long as a unity government meets three conditions - renounces violence, recognizes Israel’s right to exist and abides by past agreements - the United States would be prepared to deal with it, including on $900 million in proposed aid, Clinton indicated. Washington does business with a Lebanese government in which Hezbollah controls 11 of 30 seats, although Hezbollah is also deemed a terrorist group.

Such a changed U.S. policy makes a lot more sense than the previous one, which insisted on Hamas itself - rather than any Palestinian unity government - meeting the three conditions. No peace can be made by pretending Hamas does not exist, which is why advancing Palestinian unity must be a U.S. priority.

This sensible shift will anger Israel, although it deals indirectly with Hamas through Egypt. Israel’s de jure stand on Hamas - that it must recognize Israel before any talks begin - is wildly at odds with Israel’s de facto methodology since 1948.

So it’s a week in which I cheer Clinton, although her reference to "crippling sanctions" against Iran if the proposed rapprochement fails was a mistake. Sanctions haven’t worked and won’t. Tehran will not come to the table if it sees Obama’s extended hand as just a deceptive prelude to "crippling" measures. My advice to Tehran: watch what Obama says. He’s driving Iran policy.

Obama’s doing it in a way that means the Israeli-American friction evident in Clinton’s remarks will be a theme of his first year in office. As Lee Hamilton, the president of the Woodrow Wilson Center, told me: "Initiatives are underway that show the United States is going to have some major differences with Israel."

Iraq
7) Deaths In U.S. Raid Elicit Anger In Iraq
Premier Threatens to Prosecute Troops
Ernesto Londoño and Zaid Sabah, Washington Post, Monday, April 27, 2009
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/26/AR2009042600410.html

Iraq’s prime minister on Sunday denounced a predawn American raid in southern Iraq during which two Iraqis were killed, saying his government intends to prosecute U.S. soldiers who carried out the operation. The incident marked the first time Iraq’s government has called for the prosecution of U.S. soldiers and sets the stage for a showdown between the two countries at a time when sectarian violence appears to be spiking.

Since the implementation this year of a bilateral security agreement, U.S. forces have been barred from conducting unilateral operations and can no longer detain Iraqis for long periods. The agreement says American forces can be prosecuted in Iraqi courtrooms for grave, premeditated crimes committed off base and off duty - criteria that U.S. officials have said effectively means American soldiers will never face Iraqi justice.

But the language of the agreement is vague, U.S. and Iraqi officials have said, which could make this a test case. If that happens, it may become an irritant in U.S.-Iraqi relations and could exacerbate hostility toward American soldiers at a time when extremists are vowing to step up attacks against U.S. troops in Iraq.

Hours after the raid, as protesters gathered in downtown Kut, which is 100 miles southeast of Baghdad, the Iraqi Defense Ministry announced it had detained two top Iraqi military officials in Wasit province for authorizing the American raid without obtaining approval from their commanders.

The raid began about 1:30 a.m., when U.S. convoys pulled up outside the house of Capt. Muaamer Abid Naama al-Bidyree, who is assigned to the Interior Ministry’s internal affairs office, relatives said. Bidyree was not home at the time, they said. While American soldiers were searching the house, which is split into several apartments occupied by members of an extended family, Bidyree’s wife began screaming. "The wife was alone in the house," said Um Amar, 50, a relative who lives there. "She started yelling: ‘Americans, Americans!’ "

Bidyree’s brother Khalid, who was armed, and one of Bidyree’s sisters-in-law, Nedal Abolabas, then headed toward Bidyree’s residence. American soldiers opened fire, striking Khalid in the head, and Abolabas in the chest, Um Amar said.

In a statement, the U.S. military said soldiers opened fire on a man because "forces assessed him to be hostile." They did not elaborate. The woman, the statement said, "moved into the line of fire and was also struck by gunfire."

Kut, a predominantly Shiite city, has been relatively peaceful in recent years. Brig. Raed Shakir Jodet, the city’s police commander, and Mahmoud al-Etaibi, the chairman of the provincial council, held a news conference Sunday condemning the operation and demanding that Maliki launch an investigation. "American forces should apologize and compensate the families of the victims and release the detainees," Etaibi said.

Um Amar said top American military officials visited her home Sunday afternoon to offer an apology and return cash and cellphones that soldiers confiscated during the raid. "They said it was a mistake," she said, bawling during a telephone interview. "But they couldn’t return those who died back to us."

8) Iraq Resists Pleas By U.S. To Placate Hussein’s Party
Sam Dagher, New York Times, April 26, 2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/26/world/middleeast/26baathists.html

Baghdad - On April 18, American and British officials from a secretive unit called the Force Strategic Engagement Cell flew to Jordan to try to persuade one of Saddam Hussein’s top generals - the commander of the final defense of Baghdad in 2003 - to return home to resume efforts to make peace with the new Iraq. But the Iraqi commander, Lt. Gen. Raad Majid al-Hamdani, rebuffed them.

After a year of halting talks mediated by the Americans, he said, he concluded that Iraq’s leader, Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, simply was not interested in reconciliation.

The American appeal - described by General Hamdani and not previously reported - illustrates what could become one of the biggest obstacles to stability in Iraq. Maliki’s pledges to reconcile with some of the most ardent opponents of his government have given way to what some say is a hardening sectarianism that threatens to stoke already simmering political tensions and rising anger over a recent spate of bombings aimed at Shiites.

On March 28, Maliki’s Shiite-led government arrested a prominent Sunni leader on charges of heading a secret armed wing of Hussein’s Baath Party. A week later, the prime minister accused Baathists of orchestrating car bombings that killed more than 40 people. On Monday, he lashed out again, saying the Baath Party was "filled with hate from head to toe."

Maliki’s earlier effort to reunite the country was one of Washington’s primary benchmarks for measuring political progress in Iraq. The goal was to separate Baathist opponents of the government who were considered more willing to trade violence for political power from intractable extremists, many of them religious.

Early last year, under intense American pressure, Maliki pushed through Parliament a law to ease restrictions on the return of Baath Party members to public life. But 15 months later, the law has yet to be put into effect.

Maliki’s retreat risks polarizing Iraqis again and eroding hard-fought security gains. One hundred sixty people died in bombings on Thursday and Friday alone. There is no evidence that Baathists were involved, but fears are rising that they and jihadi insurgents are increasingly cooperating in areas, Baghdad especially, that have been largely quiet over the last year.

All of this has bewildered many Sunni Arabs who advocate reconciliation, and has mobilized the hard-liners. General Hamdani insisted that he represented only officials of the former military and security apparatus and was not negotiating for the exiled Baathist leadership, but he said any concessions from the government would have inched reconciliation forward.

He sensed this nearly two months ago, he said, when he met in the Sheraton Hotel in Amman, Jordan, with representatives of Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, a lieutenant of Hussein’s who is the last high-ranking fugitive from American forces, and who is believed to be helping to finance the insurgency. The two men told General Hamdani that Douri sent them to convey approval of his efforts to regain the jobs and property rights of former officers and to relax prohibitions against Baathists. General Hamdani said he had received even more favorable feedback from Douri’s rival for the party leadership, Mohammed Younis al-Ahmed. He said he had direct contacts with Ahmed.

But the hardening of the government’s stance on Baathists seems to be dousing any flicker of optimism. In a recent message, Douri rallied insurgents of all stripes to fight American troops and Maliki’s government.

A Baath operative in hiding north of Baghdad said in an interview that if the government were to become serious about reconciliation, it would seek to amend the Constitution and let the party resume its role in public life, like the Communist Party after the fall of the Soviet Union. "The Constitution is not a holy book - it can be amended," he said.

Pakistan
9) Pakistan Crisis and Social Statistics
Juan Cole, Informed Comment, Sunday, April 26, 2009
http://www.juancole.com/2009/04/readers-have-written-me-asking-what-i.html

Readers have written me asking what I think of the rash of almost apocalyptic pronouncements on the security situation in Pakistan issuing from the New York Times, The Telegraph, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in recent days.

As I have said before, although the rise of the Pakistani Taliban in the Pushtun areas and in some districts of Punjab is worrisome, the cosmic level of concern being expressed makes no sense to me. Some 55 percent of Pakistanis are Punjabi, and with the exception of some northern hardscrabble areas, I can’t see any evidence that the vast majority of them has the slightest interest in Talibanism. Most are religious traditionalists, Sufis, Shiites, Sufi-Shiites, or urban modernists. At the federal level, they mainly voted in February 2008 for the Pakistan People’s Party or the Muslim League, neither of them fundamentalist. The issue that excercised them most powerfully recently was the need to reinstate the civilian Supreme Court justices dismissed by a military dictatorship, who preside over a largely secular legal system.

The Pakistani Taliban are largely a phenomenon of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas west of the North-West Frontier Province, and of a few districts within the NWFP itself. These are largely Pushtun ethnically. The NYT’s breathless observation that there are Taliban a hundred miles from Islamabad doesn’t actually tell us very much, since Islamabad is geographically close to the Pushtun regions without that implying that Pushtuns dominate or could dominate it. It is like saying that Lynchburg, Va., is close to Washington DC and thereby implying that Jerry Falwell’s movement is about to take over the latter.

The Pakistani Taliban amount to a few thousand fighters who lack tanks, armored vehicles, and an air force.

The Pakistani military is the world’s sixth largest, with 550,000 active duty troops and is well equipped and well-trained. It in the past has acquitted itself well against India, a country ten times Pakistan’s size population-wise. It is the backbone of the country, and has excellent command and control, never having suffered an internal mutiny of any significance.

So what is being alleged? That some rural Pushtun tribesmen turned Taliban are about to sweep into Islamabad and overthrow the government of Pakistan? Frankly ridiculous. Wouldn’t the government bring some tank formations up from the Indian border and stop them?

Or is it being alleged that the Pakistani army won’t fight the Taliban? But then explain the long and destructive Bajaur campaign.

My guess is that the alarmism is also being promoted from within Pakistan by Pervez Musharraf, who wants to make another military coup; and by civilian politicians in Islamabad, who want to extract more money from the US to fight the Taliban that they are secretly also bribing to attack Afghanistan.

Advice to Obama: Pakistan is being configured for you in ways that benefit some narrow sectional interests. Caveat emptor.

First of all, the Pakistani military is not "unable" to stop the Taliban in the North-West Frontier Province. The Zardari government is just not desirous of alienating the Pushtuns by being heavy-handed. They only sent in 250 special ops troops to deal with Buner, which is a very light touch for an army with lots of artillery, tanks and fighter jets.

Mexico
10) Mexico proposes expanding army’s power
Mark Stevenson, Associated Press, Thursday, April 23, 2009 8:07 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/23/AR2009042303666.html

Mexico City - A bill that would let Mexico declare temporary states of emergency and expand the army’s power in a bloody fight against powerful drug gangs drew immediate fire Thursday from human rights activists who say soldiers should not be doing the job of police.

President Felipe Calderon’s proposal, which centers on the idea of declaring drug trafficking hotspots "domestic security" zones, would give the army access to civilian court and police files. The measure was submitted to Congress late Wednesday.

By law, soldiers are limited to playing a support role for police. The proposal would officially place army troops at the head of anti-crime efforts in some areas - formalizing the reality that in some places the military has effectively replaced weak or corrupt local forces.

But soldiers have been implicated in human rights abuses such as shooting civilians at checkpoints and conducting illegal searches. Human rights groups say the bill may be a sign that Calderon is reversing a promise to get the army off the streets as soon as possible.

In a February interview with The Associated Press, Calderon said he hoped to beat back the cartels by 2012 to a point that the army and federal police can withdraw and leave the problem in the hands of local law enforcement.

"It is worrisome that they could declare a state of emergency or give the army more power, given the experiences we have already had," said Consuelo Morales, director of the Monterrey-based Citizens in Support of Human Rights.

Ecuador
11) Ecuador’s victorious Correa faces economic trials
Alonso Soto and Frank Jack Daniel, Reuters, Monday, April 27, 2009 1:31 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/27/AR2009042701342.html

Quito - Ecuador’s President Rafael Correa has become the OPEC nation’s most powerful leader in a generation with an easy re-election victory on Sunday, but must now deal with an economy weakened by shrunken oil revenues.

The left-wing Correa won 52 percent of the vote, with a 24 percentage point lead over his nearest rival, former president Lucio Gutierrez, according to official results based on returns from 70 percent of polling stations.

Correa’s party is close to securing an absolute majority in the 124-member assembly, exit polls showed.

Correa, who admitted Ecuador still faces considerable economic uncertainty, said on Sunday that policies including tough import restrictions had protected the economy and jobs.

-
Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org

Just Foreign Policy is a membership organization devoted to reforming US foreign policy so it reflects the values and interests of the majority of Americans.